Diagnostic Value of Telomerase Activity in Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test

被引:3
作者
Peng, Lei [1 ]
Li, Jinze [1 ]
Meng, Chunyang [1 ]
Li, Jinming [2 ]
Tang, Dandan [3 ]
Guan, Fangxue [4 ]
Xu, Peng [5 ]
Wei, Tangqiang [1 ]
Li, Yunxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] North Sichuan Med Coll Univ, Dept Urol, Nanchong Cent Hosp, Clin Coll 2, Nanchong, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp, Coll Med, Nanchong, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Shenzhen Peoples Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Peoples Hosp Yanyuan, Internal Med, Xichang, Peoples R China
[5] Guizhou Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bladder cancer; telomerase activity; meta-analysis; diagnosis; biomarker; TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA; EXFOLIATED CELLS; NONINVASIVE DETECTION; URINE TELOMERASE; CYTOKERATIN-20; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; BIOMARKERS; MARKERS; ASSAY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.570127
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of telomerase activity (TA) for bladder cancer (BC) by meta-analysis. Methods We conducted a systematic search of studies published on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 1, 2019. We used Stata 15 and Review Manager 5.3 for calculations and statistical analysis. Results To evaluate the diagnostic value of TA for BC, we performed a meta-analysis on 22 studies, with a total of 2,867 individuals, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR, NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled parameters were calculated from all studies, and we found a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84), a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), a PLR of 8.91 (95% CI: 5.91-13.43), an NLR of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.15-0.37), a DOR of 37.90 (95% CI: 23.32-61.59), and an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94). We also conducted a subgroup analysis based on the different stages and grades of BC. Results from the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in TA in either high and low stages of BC, but that low-grade tumors had a lower TA than high-grade tumours. Conclusions TA can be used as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of bladder cancer with its high specificity. Rigorous and high-quality prospective studies are required to verify our conclusion.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic Value of Fecal MicroRNAs for Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Chengzu
    Zhao, Kai
    Rong, Qiji
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2015, 61 (12) : 1845 - 1853
  • [32] Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Gao, Yunhe
    Zhang, Kecheng
    Xi, Hongqing
    Cai, Aizhen
    Wu, Xiaosong
    Cui, Jianxin
    Li, Jiyang
    Qiao, Zhi
    Wei, Bo
    Chen, Lin
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (04) : 6330 - 6340
  • [33] Diagnostic value of HOX transcript antisense RNA for cancer detection: a meta-analysis
    Kong, Weihao
    Yang, Mingwei
    Zhu, Yunfeng
    Zuo, Xiaomin
    Wang, Hengyi
    Chen, Wei
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (05) : 401 - 412
  • [34] Diagnostic value of circular RNAs in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Zheng
    Zhao, Yan
    Liu, Yunxin
    Zou, Jianjun
    Zhu, Yubing
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (12)
  • [35] Diagnostic value of S100P for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis
    Hu, Haolin
    Zhang, Qi
    Huang, Chenfei
    Shen, Yi
    Chen, Xundi
    Shi, Xin
    Tang, Wenhao
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (10) : 9479 - 9485
  • [36] The diagnostic value of serum YKL-40 in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis
    Qin, Rongyan
    Liao, Ming
    Qin, Weili
    Wang, Jiawei
    Zheng, Fengque
    Ma, Nana
    Zhao, Yunxiao
    Qin, Aiping
    BIOMARKERS, 2022, 27 (03) : 215 - 221
  • [37] Diagnostic value of circulating miR-21 for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Shan, Liuqun
    Ji, Qian
    Cheng, Gongming
    Xia, Jianguo
    Liu, Delin
    Wu, Changde
    Zhu, Benlei
    Ding, Yongbin
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2015, 15 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [38] Diagnostic value of RASSF1A hypermethylation in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Hu, Haochang
    Zhou, Cong
    Li, Bin
    Chen, Yanfei
    Dai, Jie
    Mao, Yiyi
    Huang, Tianyi
    Yu, Hang
    Chen, Min
    Zhao, Jun
    Duan, Shiwei
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 214 (10) : 1572 - 1578
  • [39] Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs for gastric cancer in Asian populations: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Lihua
    Wang, Shan
    Cao, Xiutang
    Liu, Jianchao
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (12) : 11995 - 12004
  • [40] Diagnostic value of [18F] FDG-PET and PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Huojun
    Xing, Wei
    Kang, Qinqin
    Chen, Chao
    Wang, Linhui
    Lu, Jianping
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) : 3209 - 3214