Automated Accuracy Assessment of a Mobile Mapping System with Lightweight Laser Scanning and MEMS Sensors

被引:8
作者
Al-Durgham, Kaleel [1 ]
Lichti, Derek D. [1 ]
Kwak, Eunju [2 ]
Dixon, Ryan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Geomat Engn, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] NovAtel, Hexagon Calgary Campus,10921 14th St NE, Calgary, AB T3K 2L5, Canada
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
mobile mapping systems; lightweight lidar; accuracy assessment; registration;
D O I
10.3390/app11031007
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The accuracy assessment of mobile mapping system (MMS) outputs is usually reliant on manual labor to inspect the quality of a vast amount of collected geospatial data. This paper presents an automated framework for the accuracy assessment and quality inspection of point cloud data collected by MMSs operating with lightweight laser scanners and consumer-grade microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors. A new, large-scale test facility has been established in a challenging navigation environment (downtown area) to support the analyses conducted in this research work. MMS point cloud data are divided into short time slices for comparison with the higher-accuracy, terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) point cloud of the test facility. MMS data quality is quantified by the results of registering the point cloud of each slice with the TLS datasets. Experiments on multiple land vehicle MMS point cloud datasets using a lightweight laser scanner and three different MEMS devices are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The mean accuracy of a consumer grade MEMS (<$100) was found to be 1.13 +/- 0.47 m. The mean accuracy of two commercial MEMS (>$100) was in the range of 0.48 +/- 0.23 m to 0.85 +/- 0.52 m. The method presented here in can be straightforwardly implemented and adopted for the accuracy assessment of other MMSs types such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV)s.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Evaluation of Uncrewed Aircraft Systems' Lidar Data Quality [J].
Babbel, Benjamin J. ;
Olsen, Michael J. ;
Che, Erzhuo ;
Leshchinsky, Ben A. ;
Simpson, Chase ;
Dafni, Jake .
ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2019, 8 (12)
[2]  
Bakula K., 2017, INT J REMOTE SENS, V38, P18
[3]   A METHOD FOR REGISTRATION OF 3-D SHAPES [J].
BESL, PJ ;
MCKAY, ND .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 14 (02) :239-256
[4]   Automatic Point Cloud Registration Using a Single Octagonal Lamp Pole [J].
Chan, Ting On ;
Lichti, Derek D. ;
Belton, David ;
Hoang Long Nguyen .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 82 (04) :257-269
[5]   Multi-feature based boresight self-calibration of a terrestrial mobile mapping system [J].
Chan, Ting On ;
Lichti, Derek D. ;
Glennie, Craig L. .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 82 :112-124
[6]   Evaluation of a Light-weight Lidar and a Photogrammetric System for Unmanned Airborne Mapping Applications [J].
Conte, Gianpaolo ;
Rudol, Piotr ;
Doherty, Patrick .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIE FERNERKUNDUNG GEOINFORMATION, 2014, (04) :287-298
[7]   Rigorous Calibration of UAV-Based LiDAR Systems with Refinement of the Boresight Angles Using a Point-to-Plane Approach [J].
de Oliveira Junior, Elizeu Martins ;
dos Santos, Daniel Rodrigues .
SENSORS, 2019, 19 (23)
[8]   Mobile Laser Scanning accuracy assessment for the purpose of base-map updating [J].
Fryskowska, Anna ;
Wroblewski, Patryk .
GEODESY AND CARTOGRAPHY, 2018, 67 (01) :35-55
[9]  
Girardeau-Montaut D., 2005, ISPRS Archives, V36, pW19, DOI 10.1.1.221.8313
[10]   Calibration and Kinematic Analysis of the Velodyne HDL-64E S2 Lidar Sensor [J].
Glennie, Craig .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 78 (04) :339-347