The indication and curative effect of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic myomectomy for type II submucous myomas

被引:15
作者
Wang, Haibo [1 ]
Zhao, Jinrong [1 ]
Li, Xiujuan [1 ]
Li, Ping [1 ]
Lu, Caihong [1 ]
Tian, Shujuan [1 ]
Wang, Zhong-hua [1 ]
机构
[1] 260th Hosp PLA, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, 346 Shengli North St, Shijiazhuang 050041, Peoples R China
关键词
Submucous myomas; Fibroids; Myomectomy; Hysteroscopy; Laparoscopy; UTERINE FIBROIDS; LARGE COHORT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-016-0124-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to assess curative effect of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic myomectomy for type II submucous myomas between 3 and 5 cm in diameter and explore the optimal surgical indications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of those who underwent hysteroscopic or laparoscopic myomectomy from January 2008 to January 2013. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to the myomas diameter (namely, 30 mm <= myomas diameter <40 mm; 40 mm <= myomas diameter <50 mm; and myomas diameter >= 50 mm). Clinical data such as operation time, amount of bleeding, postoperative anal exsufflation time, hospital stay, and complications were collected. Results: There was no significant difference regarding operation time and amount of bleeding in two groups. We found significant difference in hysteroscopic group (within-subgroup) difference regarding operation time and amount of bleeding, whereas no significant difference in the laparoscopic group, while significant differences between-subgroup differences regarding operation time. Complete removal of myoma was seen in all patients. Conclusions: Both techniques are feasible for type II submucous myomas. Laparoscopic operation has higher advantages in type II submucous myomas of greater than 4 cm in diameter whereas hysteroscopic operation has higher advantages in type II submucous myomas of lower than 4 cm in diameter.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Clinical Outcomes and Comparative Evidence [J].
Buckley, Victoria A. ;
Nesbitt-Hawes, Erin M. ;
Atkinson, Paul ;
Won, Ha Ryun ;
Deans, Rebecca ;
Burton, Alice ;
Lyons, Stephen D. ;
Abbott, Jason A. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) :11-25
[2]   Hysteroscopic Management of Large Symptomatic Submucous Uterine Myomas [J].
Camanni, M. ;
Bonino, Luca ;
Delpiano, E. M. ;
Ferrero, B. ;
Migliaretti, G. ;
Deltetto, F. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) :59-65
[3]   Review of nonsurgical/minimally invasive treatments and open myomectomy for uterine fibroids [J].
Chittawar, Priya B. ;
Kamath, Mohan S. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 27 (06) :391-397
[4]   Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids [J].
Chittawar, Priya Bhave ;
Franik, Sebastian ;
Pouwer, Annefloor W. ;
Farquhar, Cindy .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (10)
[5]   Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view [J].
Dubuisson, JB ;
Fauconnier, A ;
Babaki-Fard, K ;
Chapron, C .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2000, 6 (06) :588-594
[6]   Laparoscopic myomectomy: predicting the risk of conversion to an open procedure [J].
Dubuisson, JB ;
Fauconnier, A ;
Fourchotte, V ;
Babaki-Fard, K ;
Coste, J ;
Chapron, C .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (08) :1726-1731
[7]   The Impact and Management of Fibroids for Fertility An Evidence-Based Approach [J].
Guo, Xiaoxiao Catherine ;
Segars, James H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 39 (04) :521-+
[8]   Office Hysteroscopic Laser Enucleation of Submucous Myomas without Mass Extraction: A Case Series Study [J].
Haimovich, Sergio ;
Lopez-Yarto, Maite ;
Urresta Avila, Julio ;
Saavedra Tascon, Alejandro ;
Hernandez, Jose L. ;
Carreras Collado, Ramon .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[9]   Hysteroscopic treatment of submucous myomas [J].
Indman, Paul D. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (04) :811-820
[10]   Techniques of laparoscopic myomectomy [J].
Mattei, Alberto ;
Cioni, Riccardo ;
Bargelli, Gianni ;
Scarselli, Gianfranco .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2011, 23 (01) :34-39