WHY CAN'T JOHNNY REMEMBER THE BASIC FACTS?

被引:48
|
作者
Baroody, Arthur J. [1 ]
Bajwa, Neet Priya [1 ]
Eiland, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
arithmetic knowledge; basic number combinations; combination fluency; meaningful memorization; number facts; number sense; NUMBER COMBINATION SKILL; STRATEGY CHOICES; MATH PERFORMANCE; SIMPLE ADDITION; YOUNG-CHILDREN; MATHEMATICS; STUDENTS; INSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE; DISABILITIES;
D O I
10.1002/ddrr.45
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Memorizing the basic number combinations, such as 9 + 7 = 16 and 16 - 9 = 7, is a punishing and insurmountable task for children with difficulties learning mathematics. Two perspectives on such learning lead to different conclusions about the primary source of this key learning difficulty. According to the conventional wisdom (the Passive Storage View), memorizing a basic fact is a simple form of learning-merely forming and strengthening an association between an expression and its answer. The two primary reasons this simple form of learning does not occur are inadequate practice or, in cases where adequate practice has been provided, a defect in the learner. According to the number sense perspective (Active Construction View), memorizing the basic combinations entails constructing a well-structured or -connected body of knowledge that involves patterns, relations, algebraic rules, and automatic reasoning processes, as well as facts. In effect, fluency with the basic number combinations begins with and grows out of number sense. Aspects of number sense critical to such fluency begin to develop in the preschool years. According to the Active Construction View, the primary cause of problems with the basic combinations, especially among children at risk for or already experiencing learning difficulties, is the lack of opportunity to develop number sense during the preschool and early school years. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009; 15:69-79.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 79
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why Dreaming Worlds aren't Nearby Possible Worlds
    Simpson, James
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2023, 73 (04): : 1226 - 1243
  • [42] Why Education and Choice Won't Solve the Obesity Problem
    Walls, Helen L.
    Peeters, Anna
    Loff, Bebe
    Crammond, Bradley R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 99 (04) : 590 - 592
  • [43] Why it pays off to pay us well: The impact of basic research on economic growth and welfare
    Prettner, Klaus
    Werner, Katharina
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (05) : 1075 - 1090
  • [44] ?Why can?t writing courses be taught like this fo real?: Leveraging critical language awareness to promote African American Language speakers? writing skills
    Hankerson, Shenika
    JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2022, 58
  • [45] Ask me why, don't tell me why: Asking children for explanations facilitates relational thinking
    Brockbank, Erik
    Lombrozo, Tania
    Gopnik, Alison
    Walker, Caren M.
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 26 (01)
  • [46] Why can an environmental policy tax promote growth through the channel of education?
    Grimaud, Andre
    Tournemaine, Frederic
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [47] Tversky and Kahneman's Cognitive Illusions: Who Can Solve Them, and Why?
    Bruckmaier, Georg
    Krauss, Stefan
    Binder, Karin
    Hilbert, Sven
    Brunner, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [48] Why Qualitative Research is Needed in Gerontology and How We Can Do It Better
    Phoenix, Cassandra
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2018, 73 (07): : E81 - E85
  • [49] Can probability theory explain why closure is both intuitive and prone to counterexamples?
    Marcello Di Bello
    Philosophical Studies, 2018, 175 : 2145 - 2168
  • [50] Can probability theory explain why closure is both intuitive and prone to counterexamples?
    Di Bello, Marcello
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2018, 175 (09) : 2145 - 2168