Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: A systematic review of mobile apps

被引:20
作者
Ali, Syed Mustafa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lau, Wei J. [4 ]
McBeth, John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dixon, William G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Ctr Epidemiol Versus Arthrit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Ctr Hlth Informat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Cent Manchester Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr MAHSC, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; LOCATION; VALIDATION; DIAGRAMS; EXTENT;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1688
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability. Improving our understanding of pain occurrence and treatment effectiveness requires robust methods to measure pain at scale. Smartphone-based pain manikins are human-shaped figures to self-report location-specific aspects of pain on people's personal mobile devices. Methods We searched the main app stores to explore the current state of smartphone-based pain manikins and to formulate recommendations to guide their development in the future. Results The search yielded 3,938 apps. Twenty-eight incorporated a pain manikin and were included in the analysis. For all apps, it was unclear whether they had been tested and had end-user involvement in the development. Pain intensity and quality could be recorded in 28 and 13 apps, respectively, but this was location specific in only 11 and 4. Most manikins had two or more views (n = 21) and enabled users to shade or select body areas to record pain location (n = 17). Seven apps allowed personalising the manikin appearance. Twelve apps calculated at least one metric to summarise manikin reports quantitatively. Twenty-two apps had an archive of historical manikin reports; only eight offered feedback summarising manikin reports over time. Conclusions Several publically available apps incorporated a manikin for pain reporting, but only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating manikin-derived quantitative scores, or generating summary feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future developments should harness manikins' digital nature and include robust validation studies. Involving end users in the development may increase manikins' acceptability as a tool to self-report pain. Significance This review identified and characterised 28 smartphone apps that included a pain manikin (i.e. pain drawings) as a novel approach to measure pain in large populations. Only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating quantitative scores based on manikin reports, or generating manikin feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future studies should harness the digital nature of manikins, and establish the measurement properties of manikins. Furthermore, we believe that involving end users in the development process will increase acceptability of manikins as a tool for self-reporting pain.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 338
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pain descriptors for critically ill patients unable to self-report
    Haslam, Lynn
    Dale, Craig
    Knechtel, Leasa
    Rose, Louise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2012, 68 (05) : 1082 - 1089
  • [42] Measurement properties of self-report physical activity assessment tools for patients with stroke: a systematic review
    Martins, Julia Caetano
    Aguiar, Larissa Tavares
    Nadeau, Sylvie
    Scianni, Aline Alvim
    Teixeira-Salmela, Luci Fuscaldi
    Coelho De Morais Faria, Christina Danielli
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 23 (06) : 476 - 490
  • [43] Diagnostic accuracy of self-report and subjective history in the diagnosis of low back pain with non-specific lower extremity symptoms: A systematic review
    Shultz, Susan
    Averell, Kristina
    Eickelman, Angela
    Sanker, Holly
    Donaldson, Megan Burrowbridge
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2015, 20 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [44] Digital Support Interventions for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review
    Nicholl, Barbara I.
    Sandal, Louise F.
    Stochkendahl, Mette J.
    McCallum, Marianne
    Suresh, Nithya
    Vasseljen, Ottar
    Hartvigsen, Jan
    Mork, Paul J.
    Kjaer, Per
    Sogaard, Karen
    Mair, Frances S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (05)
  • [45] Self-Report Measures of Boredom: An Updated Review of the Literature
    Vodanovich, Stephen J.
    Watt, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 150 (02) : 194 - 226
  • [46] BEHAVIORAL PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS UNABLE TO SELF-REPORT PAIN
    Rose, Louise
    Haslam, Lynn
    Dale, Craig
    Knechtel, Leasa
    McGillion, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 22 (03) : 246 - 255
  • [47] Accuracy of Patient Self-Report of Stroke: A Systematic Review from the UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group
    Woodfield, Rebecca
    Sudlow, Cathie L. M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [48] Personal recovery self-report outcome measures in serious mental illness: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Felix, Simon
    Valery, Kevin -Marc
    Caiada, Meryl
    Guionnet, Sarah
    Bonilla-Guerrero, Julien
    Destaillats, Jean-Marc
    Prouteau, Antoinette
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 112
  • [49] Self-report depression screening measures for older Hispanic/Latin American adults: A PRISMA systematic review
    Lopez, Andrea Ochoa
    Martinez, Michelle N.
    Garcia, Joshua M.
    Kunik, Mark E.
    Medina, Luis D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 294 : 1 - 9
  • [50] Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Patient Self-Report versus Trained Assessor Joint Counts in Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Barton, Jennifer L.
    Criswell, Lindsey A.
    Kaiser, Rachel
    Chen, Yea-Hung
    Schillinger, Dean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 36 (12) : 2635 - 2641