Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: A systematic review of mobile apps

被引:20
|
作者
Ali, Syed Mustafa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lau, Wei J. [4 ]
McBeth, John [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dixon, William G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van der Veer, Sabine N. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Ctr Epidemiol Versus Arthrit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Ctr Hlth Informat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Cent Manchester Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr MAHSC, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; LOCATION; VALIDATION; DIAGRAMS; EXTENT;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1688
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability. Improving our understanding of pain occurrence and treatment effectiveness requires robust methods to measure pain at scale. Smartphone-based pain manikins are human-shaped figures to self-report location-specific aspects of pain on people's personal mobile devices. Methods We searched the main app stores to explore the current state of smartphone-based pain manikins and to formulate recommendations to guide their development in the future. Results The search yielded 3,938 apps. Twenty-eight incorporated a pain manikin and were included in the analysis. For all apps, it was unclear whether they had been tested and had end-user involvement in the development. Pain intensity and quality could be recorded in 28 and 13 apps, respectively, but this was location specific in only 11 and 4. Most manikins had two or more views (n = 21) and enabled users to shade or select body areas to record pain location (n = 17). Seven apps allowed personalising the manikin appearance. Twelve apps calculated at least one metric to summarise manikin reports quantitatively. Twenty-two apps had an archive of historical manikin reports; only eight offered feedback summarising manikin reports over time. Conclusions Several publically available apps incorporated a manikin for pain reporting, but only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating manikin-derived quantitative scores, or generating summary feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future developments should harness manikins' digital nature and include robust validation studies. Involving end users in the development may increase manikins' acceptability as a tool to self-report pain. Significance This review identified and characterised 28 smartphone apps that included a pain manikin (i.e. pain drawings) as a novel approach to measure pain in large populations. Only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating quantitative scores based on manikin reports, or generating manikin feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future studies should harness the digital nature of manikins, and establish the measurement properties of manikins. Furthermore, we believe that involving end users in the development process will increase acceptability of manikins as a tool for self-reporting pain.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 338
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Smartphone apps for the self-management of low back pain: A systematic review
    Machado, Gustavo C.
    Pinheiro, Marina B.
    Lee, Hopin
    Ahmed, Osman H.
    Hendrick, Paul
    Williams, Chris
    Kamper, Steven J.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 30 (06): : 1098 - 1109
  • [2] Effectiveness of smartphone apps for the self-management of low back pain in adults: a systematic review
    Didyk, Claudia
    Lewis, Lucy Kate
    Lange, Belinda
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (25) : 7781 - 7790
  • [3] Patient Self-report Measures of Chronic Pain Consultation Measures: A Systematic Review
    Stomski, Norman Jay
    Mackintosh, Shylie
    Stanley, Mandy
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 26 (03) : 235 - 243
  • [4] A Systematic Review of Self-Report Measures of Paranoia
    Statham, Verity
    Emerson, Lisa-Marie
    Rowse, Georgina
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 31 (02) : 139 - 158
  • [5] Self-criticism self-report measures: Systematic review
    Rose, Alexandra V.
    Rimes, Katharine A.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 91 (04) : 450 - 489
  • [6] A systematic review of self-report measures of generalized shame
    Lear, M. Kati
    Lee, Eric B.
    Smith, Sarah M.
    Luoma, Jason B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 78 (07) : 1288 - 1330
  • [7] Validation of Pediatric Self-Report Pain Scales in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review
    Rineer, Stephen
    Kwakye, Derek
    Ambrose, Emmanuela E.
    Jason, Don P.
    Smart, Luke R.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2025, 69 (02) : e103 - e112
  • [8] Systematic Review of Self-Report Measures of Maternal Self-Efficacy
    Jiramanee, Atchareya
    Driessnack, Martha
    Tilden, Ellen
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2022, 51 (05): : 491 - 501
  • [9] Low back pain self-management mobile applications: a systematic review on digital platforms
    Cargnin, Zulamar Aguiar
    Schneider, Dulcineia Ghizoni
    de Souza, Michelle Goncalves
    Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira
    Tourinho, Francis Solange Vieira
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2024, 58
  • [10] Self-report measures of secure attachment in adulthood: A systematic review
    Justo-Nunez, Miranda
    Morris, Lydia
    Berry, Katherine
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2022, 29 (06) : 1812 - 1842