ONCOLOGISTS' BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS FOR ONCOTYPE DX USE: QUALITATIVE STUDY

被引:10
|
作者
Roberts, Megan C. [1 ,2 ]
Bryson, Amy [3 ]
Weinberger, Morris [1 ,4 ]
Dusetzina, Stacie B. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Dinan, Michaela A. [6 ,7 ]
Reeder-Hayes, Katherine [2 ,8 ]
Wheeler, Stephanie B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UNC, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Hlth Policy Management, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] UNC, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[3] UNC, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Hlth Behav, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Durham Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Durham, NC USA
[5] UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Div Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[7] Duke Univ, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[8] UNC, Div Hematol Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer; Gene expression profiling; Qualitative research; RECURRENCE SCORE ASSAY; STAGE BREAST-CANCER; GENE-EXPRESSION; RISK; WOMEN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1017/S026646231600060X
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Oncotype DX (ODX), a tumor gene profiling test, has been incorporated into clinical guidelines to aid in adjuvant chemotherapy decision making for early-stage, hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients. Despite United States (U.S.) guidelines, less than half of eligible women receive testing. Reasons for low usage are unclear: Our objective was to better understand U.S. oncologists' ODX uptake and how they use ODX during adjuvant chemotherapy decision making. Methods: We conducted semi-structured, similar to 30-minute phone interviews with medical and surgical oncologists in one U.S. State using purposive sampling. Oncologists were included if they saw greater than or equal to five breast cancer patients per week. Recruitment ended upon thematic saturation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and double-coded using template analysis. Results: During analysis, themes emerged across three domains. First, organizational factors (i.e., departmental structure, ODX marketing, and medical/insurance guidelines) influenced ease of ODX use. Second, oncologists referenced the influence of interpersonal factors (e.g., normative beliefs and peer use of ODX) over their own practices and recommendations. Third, intrapersonal factors (e.g., oncologist attitudes, perceived barriers, and research gaps) were discussed: although oncologists largely held positive attitudes about ODX, they reported challenges with interpreting intermediate scores for treatment decisions and explaining test results to patients. Finally, oncologists identified several research gaps. Conclusions: As more tumor gene profiling tests are incorporated into cancer care for treatment decision making, it is important to understand their use in clinical practice. This study identified multi-level factors that influence ODX uptake into clinical practice, providing insights into facilitators and modifiable barriers that can be leveraged for improving ODX uptake to aid treatment decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 361
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study
    Gele, Abdi A.
    Musse, Fathia K.
    Shrestha, Mary
    Qureshi, Samera
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [22] A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to compression stocking use in patients with chronic venous insufficiency
    Simmonds, Lucy
    Krysa, Jolanta
    Currie, Abby
    Clifford, Kari A.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024,
  • [23] Barriers and facilitators to the use of an immunization application: a qualitative study supplemented with Google Analytics data
    Burgess, Kathleen
    Atkinson, Katherine M.
    Westeinde, Jacqueline
    Crowcroft, Natasha
    Deeks, Shelley L.
    Wilson, Kumanan
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 39 (03) : E118 - E126
  • [24] Facilitators and barriers to bicycle helmet use: A qualitative evidence synthesis
    Panigrahi, Sucharita
    Parveen, Samina
    Kshatri, Jaya
    Pati, Sanghamitra
    Bhaumik, Soumyadeep
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 11 (09) : 5211 - 5225
  • [25] The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study
    Smola, Paulina
    Mlozniak, Iwona
    Wojcieszko, Monika
    Zwierczyk, Urszula
    Kobryn, Mateusz
    Rzepecka, Elzbieta
    Duplaga, Mariusz
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Barriers and facilitators of supportive care access and use among men with cancer: a qualitative study
    Montiel, Corentin
    Bedrossian, Nathalie
    Kramer, Asher
    Myre, Andre
    Piche, Alexia
    McDonough, Meghan H.
    Sabiston, Catherine M.
    Petrella, Anika
    Gauvin, Lise
    Dore, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2025, 19 (01) : 306 - 318
  • [27] A Qualitative Study of Barriers & Facilitators to Arthritis Patients' use of Physical Activity Monitoring Tools
    Leese, Jenny
    Tran, Bao
    Backman, Catherine
    Townsend, Anne
    Davis, Aileen
    Gromala, Diane
    Avina-Zubieta, Antonio
    Li, Linda
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 43 (06) : 1176 - 1177
  • [28] Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use: A qualitative approach
    Fishman, Elliot
    Washington, Simon
    Haworth, Narelle
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 15 (06) : 686 - 698
  • [29] Facilitators of and barriers to perinatal telepsychiatry care: a qualitative study
    Howard, Anna
    Wang, Sunny
    Adachi, Jamie
    Yadama, Alexa
    Bhat, Amritha
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [30] DEVELOPING DEMENTIA NETWORKS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS
    Draskovic, I.
    Otero, M.
    Hesselink, G.
    Rikkert, M. Olde
    Vernooij, M.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2011, 51 : 183 - 183