Gestational systolic blood pressure trajectories and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in Chinese women

被引:19
|
作者
Teng, Haoyue [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yumei [3 ]
Han, Bing [4 ]
Liu, Jieyu [1 ]
Cao, Yingying [5 ]
Wang, Jiaxiang [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaoyan [6 ]
Fu, Jiaojiao [1 ,2 ]
Ling, Qi [3 ]
Xiao, Chengqi [1 ]
Wan, Zhongxiao [1 ,7 ]
Yin, Jieyun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Jiangsu Key Lab Prevent & Translat Med Geriatr Di, Sch Publ Hlth, Med Coll, 199 Renai Rd, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Med Coll, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] First Peoples Hosp TaiCang, Dept Obstet, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Women & Children Hlth Care Ctr Taicang, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] Suzhou Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Suzhou 215004, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[7] Soochow Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr & Food Hyg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Systolic blood pressure; Trajectory; Fetal outcome; Maternal outcome; Latent class growth mixture model; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; FETAL-GROWTH; PREGNANCY; BIRTH; WEIGHT; MANAGEMENT; AGE; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE; DROP;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-021-03599-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Associations between trajectories of systolic blood pressure (SBP) during pregnancy and pregnant outcomes remain unclear and disparate. Methods Data of 20,353 mothers without chronic hypertension and who delivered live singletons between January, 2014 and November, 2019, was extracted from Taicang register-based cohort. Based on SBP measured during 10 to 40 weeks of gestation, SBP trajectories were explored using latent class growth mixture model, and their associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes were assessed by logistic regression analyses. Results Six heterogeneous SBP trajectories were identified: low delayed-increasing (7.47%), low reverse-increasing (21.88%), low-stable (19.13%), medium-stable (21.64%), medium reverse-increasing (16.47%), and high stable (13.41%) trajectories. The high-stable trajectory had SBP around 125 mmHg in the 10th gestational week, and increased slightly onwards. When compared with the low-stable trajectory, the high-stable trajectory had maximally adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 5.28 (2.76-10.10), 1.30 (1.13-1.50), 1.53 (1.12-2.08), 1.32 (1.06-1.65) and 1.64 (1.08-2.48) for gestational hypertension (GH), early-term delivery (ETD), preterm delivery (PTD), small for gestational age and low birth weight (LBW), respectively. Besides, the medium reverse-increasing trajectory showed significantly increased risk of GH and ETD, while the medium-stable trajectory had significantly elevated risk of ETD and PTD. Notably, SBP trajectories slightly but significantly improved risk discrimination of GH, ETD and LBW, over traditional risk factors. Conclusion Women with different SBP trajectories were at varied risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Meanwhile, our study suggested that BP monitoring during pregnancy is necessary, especially for women with high SBP in early pregnancy or upward trajectory.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gestational systolic blood pressure trajectories and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in Chinese women
    Haoyue Teng
    Yumei Wang
    Bing Han
    Jieyu Liu
    Yingying Cao
    Jiaxiang Wang
    Xiaoyan Zhu
    Jiaojiao Fu
    Qi Ling
    Chengqi Xiao
    Zhongxiao Wan
    Jieyun Yin
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [2] Associations of systolic blood pressure trajectories during pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Guo, Qianlan
    Feng, Pei
    Yu, Qian
    Zhu, Wei
    Hu, Hao
    Chen, Xin
    Li, Hongmei
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2020, 43 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [3] Associations of systolic blood pressure trajectories during pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Qianlan Guo
    Pei Feng
    Qian Yu
    Wei Zhu
    Hao Hu
    Xin Chen
    Hongmei Li
    Hypertension Research, 2020, 43 : 227 - 234
  • [4] Maternal prepregnancy obesity and gestational diabetes influence on adverse perinatal outcomes
    de Carvalho, Leonardo Souza
    de Oliveira, Antonia Aparecida Deluca
    Grabovski, Tassiana Cristina Martins
    Renzo, Carla Christina
    Ribeiro e Silva, Rodrigo
    Loz, Sabrina Hafemann
    Silva, Jean Carl
    ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2023, 67 (04):
  • [5] Risk factors for adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia: analysis of 1396 cases
    Li, Xun
    Zhang, Weishe
    Lin, Jianhua
    Liu, Huai
    Yang, Zujing
    Teng, Yincheng
    Duan, Si
    Lin, Xinxiu
    Xie, Yingming
    Li, Yuanqiu
    Xie, Liangqun
    Peng, Qiaozhen
    Xia, Lu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2018, 20 (06): : 1049 - 1057
  • [6] Effects of blood pressure level management on maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with mild to moderate gestational hypertension
    Wang, Lianyun
    Ye, Wen
    Xiong, Wendong
    Wang, Fan
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 91 (03) : 137 - 143
  • [7] The influence of maternal gestational weight gain on adverse perinatal outcomes
    Yan, Qingshan
    Cai, Wenya
    Guo, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [8] Trajectories of maternal D-dimer are associated with the risk of developing adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes: A prospective birth cohort study
    Zhu, Yibing
    Liu, Zhaozhen
    Miao, Chong
    Wang, Xiaomei
    Liu, Wenjuan
    Chen, Shali
    Gao, Haiyan
    Li, Wei
    Wu, Zhengqin
    Cao, Hua
    Li, Haibo
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2023, 543
  • [9] Treatment of women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes
    Goyette, Fanny
    Wo, Bi Lan
    Iglesias, Marie-Helene
    Rey, Evelyne
    Godbout, Ariane
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2023, 49 (04)
  • [10] Low Gestational Weight Gain and Risk of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Obese and Severely Obese Women
    Bodnar, Lisa M.
    Pugh, Sarah J.
    Lash, Timothy L.
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Himes, Katherine P.
    Parisi, Sara M.
    Abrams, Barbara
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (06) : 894 - 902