Are suicide deaths under-reported? Nationwide re-evaluations of 1800 deaths in Scandinavia

被引:97
作者
Tollefsen, Ingvild Maria [1 ,2 ]
Helweg-Larsen, Karin [3 ]
Thiblin, Ingemar [4 ]
Hem, Erlend [2 ,5 ]
Kastrup, Marianne C.
Nyberg, Ullakarin [6 ]
Rogde, Sidsel [7 ,8 ]
Zahl, Per-Henrik [7 ]
Ostevold, Gunvor [7 ]
Ekeberg, Oivind [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ullevaal Hosp, Dept Acute Med, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dept Behav Sci Med, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Social Med & Publ Hlth Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Univ Oslo, Ullevaal Hosp, Div Mental Hlth & Addict, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[6] Karolinska Inst, Stockholm Ctr Psychiat Res & Educ, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[8] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
STATISTICS; RATES; AUTOPSIES; IRELAND; MANNER; US;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Valid mortality statistics are important for healthcare planning and research. Suicides and accidents often present a challenge in the classification of the manner of death. The aim of this study was to analyse the reliability of the national suicide statistics by comparing the classification of suicide in the Scandinavian cause of death registers with a reclassification by 8 persons with different medical expertise (psychiatry, forensic pathology and public health) from each of the 3 Scandinavian countries. Methods: The cause of death registers in Norway, Sweden and Denmark retrieved available information on a sample of 600 deaths in 2008 from each country. 200 were classified in the registers as suicides, 200 as accidents or undetermined and 200 as natural deaths. The reclassification comprised an assessment of the manner and cause of death as well as the level of certainty. Results: In total, 81%, 88% and 90% of deaths registered as suicide in the official mortality statistics were confirmed by experts using the Swedish, Norwegian and Danish data sets, respectively. About 3% of deaths classified as accidents or natural deaths in the cause of death registers were reclassified as suicides. However, after a second reclassification based on additional information, 9% of the natural deaths and accidents were reclassified as suicides in the Norwegian data set, and 21% of the undetermined deaths were reclassified as suicides in the Swedish data set. In total, the levels of certainty of the experts were 87% of suicides in the Norwegian data set, 77% in the Swedish data set and 92% in Danish data set; the uncertainty was highest in poisoning suicides. Conclusions: A high percentage of reported suicides were confirmed as being suicides. Few accidents and natural deaths were reclassified as suicides. Hence, reclassification did not increase the overall official suicide statistics of the 3 Scandinavian countries.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ahlm K, 2001, LAKARTIDNINGEN, V98, P2016
[2]   CAUSES OF DEATH IN A COHORT OF 50465 YOUNG MEN - VALIDITY OF RECORDED SUICIDE AS UNDERLYING CAUSE OF DEATH [J].
ALLEBECK, P ;
ALLGULANDER, C ;
HENNINGSOHN, L ;
JAKOBSSON, SW .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (04) :242-247
[3]   COMPARABILITY OF SUICIDE RATES [J].
ATKINSON, MW ;
KESSEL, N ;
DALGAARD, JB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1975, 127 (SEP) :247-256
[4]  
BLOTH B, 1976, ACTA MED SCAND, V200, P281
[5]   Suicide surveillance in the US military - Reporting and classification biases in rate calculations [J].
Carr, JR ;
Hoge, CW ;
Gardner, J ;
Potter, R .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2004, 34 (03) :233-241
[6]   SUICIDE RATES IN IRELAND [J].
CLARKEFINNEGAN, M ;
FAHY, TJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1983, 13 (02) :385-391
[7]  
Connolly J F, 1995, Crisis, V16, P34, DOI 10.1027/0227-5910.16.1.34
[8]  
Eisenwort B, 2006, NERVENARZT, V77, P1355, DOI 10.1007/s00115-005-1965-y
[9]  
Ekeberg O, 1985, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, V105, P123
[10]   Suicide note themes and suicide prevention [J].
Foster, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (04) :323-331