Validation of a Screening Tool for the Early Identification of Sepsis

被引:95
作者
Moore, Laura J. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Stephen L.
Kreiner, Laura A. [3 ]
McKinley, Bruce
Sucher, Joseph F.
Todd, S. Rob [2 ]
Turner, Krista L. [2 ]
Valdivia, Alicia
Moore, Frederick A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Houston, TX USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2009年 / 66卷 / 06期
关键词
Sepsis; Sepsis screening; Evidence-based care; Sepsis protocol; Surgical sepsis; DECISION-SUPPORT; SEPTIC SHOCK; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a3ac4b
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in noncoronary intensive care units. Recent evidence based guidelines outline strategies for the management of sepsis and studies have shown that early implementation of these guidelines improves survival. We developed an extensive logic-based sepsis management protocol; however, we found that early recognition of sepsis was a major obstacle to protocol implementation. To improve this, we developed a three-step sepsis screening tool with escalating levels of decision making. We hypothesized that aggressive screening for sepsis would improve early recognition of sepsis and decrease sepsis-related mortality by insuring early appropriate interventions. Methods: Patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit were screened twice daily by our nursing staff. The initial screen assesses the systemic inflammatory response syndrome parameters (heart rate, temperature, white blood tell count, and respiratory rate) and assigns a numeric score (0-4) for each. Patients with a score of >= 4 screened positive proceed to the second step of the tool in which a midlevel provider attempts to identify the source of infection. If the patients screens positive for both systemic inflammatory response syndrome and an infection, the intensivist was notified to determine whether to implement our sepsis protocol. Results: Over 5 months, 4,991 screens were completed on 920 patients. The prevalence of sepsis was 12.2%. The screening tool yielded a sensitivity of 96.5%, specificity of 96.7%, a positive predictive value of 80.2%, and a negative predictive value of 99.5%. In addition, sepsis-related mortality decreased from 35.1% to 23.3%. Conclusions: The three step sepsis screening tool is a valid tool for the early identification of sepsis. Implementation of this tool and our logic-based sepsis protocol has decreased sepsis-related mortality in our SICU by one third.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1547
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care [J].
Angus, DC ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT ;
Lidicker, J ;
Clermont, G ;
Carcillo, J ;
Pinsky, MR .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) :1303-1310
[2]   Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome is an elusive early complication of traumatic shock resuscitation [J].
Balogh, Z ;
McKinley, BA ;
Cocanour, CS ;
Kozar, RA ;
Holcomb, JB ;
Ware, DN ;
Moore, FA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 184 (06) :538-543
[3]  
Dellinger RP, 2008, INTENS CARE MED, V34, P783, DOI [10.1007/s00134-008-1040-9, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41]
[4]   Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock [J].
Dellinger, RP ;
Carlet, JM ;
Masur, H ;
Gerlach, H ;
Calandra, T ;
Cohen, J ;
Gea-Banacloche, J ;
Keh, D ;
Marshall, JC ;
Parker, MM ;
Ramsay, G ;
Zimmerman, JL ;
Vincent, JL ;
Levy, MM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03) :858-873
[5]   Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: A trend analysis from 1993 to 2003 [J].
Dombrovskiy, Viktor Y. ;
Martin, Andrew A. ;
Sunderram, Jagadeeshan ;
Paz, Harold L. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (05) :1244-1250
[6]   The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study [J].
Gao, F ;
Melody, T ;
Daniels, DF ;
Giles, S ;
Fox, S .
CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 9 (06) :R764-R770
[7]   Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update [J].
Hollenberg, SM ;
Ahrens, TS ;
Annane, D ;
Astiz, ME ;
Chalfin, DB ;
Dasta, JF ;
Heard, SO ;
Martin, C ;
Napolitano, LM ;
Susla, GM ;
Totaro, R ;
Vincent, JL ;
Zanotti-Cavazzoni, S .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (09) :1928-1948
[8]   APACHE-II - A SEVERITY OF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
DRAPER, EA ;
WAGNER, DP ;
ZIMMERMAN, JE .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1985, 13 (10) :818-829
[9]   Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock [J].
Kumar, Arland ;
Roberts, Daniel ;
Wood, Kenneth E. ;
Light, Bruce ;
Parrillo, Joseph E. ;
Sharma, Satendra ;
Suppes, Robert ;
Feinstein, Daniel ;
Zanotti, Sergio ;
Taiberg, Leo ;
Gurka, David ;
Kumar, Aseem ;
Cheang, Mary .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (06) :1589-1596
[10]   Computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation of trauma induced ARDS: Results of a randomized clinical trial [J].
McKinley, BA ;
Moore, FA ;
Sailors, RM ;
Cocanour, CS ;
Marquez, A ;
Wright, RK ;
Tonnesen, AS ;
Wallace, CJ ;
Morris, AH ;
East, TD .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 50 (03) :415-424