Is there regional variation in the SF-36 scores of Canadian adults?

被引:13
作者
Hopman, WM
Berger, C
Joseph, L
Towheed, T
Anastassiades, T
Tenenhouse, A
Poliquin, S
Brown, JP
Murray, TM
Aclachi, JD
Hanley, DA
Papadimitropoulos, EA
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Community Hlth, MacKenzie Hlth Serv Res Grp, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, CaMos Methods Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Div Rheumatol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, CaMos Natl Coordinating Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Ste Foy, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
[10] Eli Lilly & Co, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2002年 / 93卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03405008
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Canadian normative data for the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form (SF-36) have recently been published. However, there is evidence from other countries to suggest that regional variation in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) may exist. We therefore examined the SF-36 data from nine Canadian centres for evidence of systematic differences. Methods: Bayesian hierarchical modelling was used to compare the differences in the eight SF-36 domains and the two summary component scores within each of the age and gender strata across the nine sites. Results: Five domains and the two summary component scores showed little clinically important variation. Other than a small number of exceptions, there was little overall evidence of HRQOL differences across most domains and across most sites. Interpretation: Our finding of only a few small differences suggests that there is no need to develop region-specific Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 237
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials
[2]  
Berzon RA, 1998, OX MED PUBL, P3
[3]  
Hopman WM, 2000, CAN MED ASSOC J, V163, P265
[4]   Research notes: The Canadian multicentre osteoporosis study (CaMos): Background, rationale, methods [J].
Kreiger, N ;
Tenenhouse, A ;
Joseph, L ;
Mackenzie, T ;
Poliquin, S ;
Brown, JP ;
Prior, JC ;
Rittmaster, RS .
CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 1999, 18 (03) :376-387
[5]  
LYONS RA, 1995, J PUBLIC HEALTH MED, V17, P46
[6]  
Raftery AL, 1992, BAYESIAN STATISTICS, V4, P763
[7]  
SPIEGELHALTER D. J., 1996, BUGS BAYESIAN INFERE
[8]  
*STAT CAN, 1993, 93310 STAT CAN
[9]  
*STAT CAN, 1991, 93337 STAT CAN
[10]  
WARE JE, 1994, SF36 PHYSICAL MENTAL