Differentiation of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant lymphadenopathy in the neck with quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Payabvash, Seyedmehdi [1 ]
Brackett, Alexandria [2 ]
Forghani, Reza [3 ,4 ]
Malhotra, Ajay [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, Box 208042,333 Cedar St,Tompkins East 2, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Cushing Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[3] McGill Univ, Gerald Bronfman Dept Oncol, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Apparent diffusion coefficient; Metastasis; Lymphoma; Cervical lymphadenopathy; CERVICAL LYMPH-NODES; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; COEFFICIENT VALUES; HEAD; MRI; BENIGN; DISCRIMINATION; MANAGEMENT; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-019-02236-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature comparing average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies comparing average ADC of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant neck lymph nodes were included. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random-effects models. In subgroup analysis of those studies applying ADC threshold for differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathy, pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) area under the curve (AUC) were determined.ResultsA total of 27 studies with 1165 patients were included, pooling data from 225 lymphomatous, 1162 metastatic, and 1333 non-malignant cervical lymph nodes. The average ADC values were lower in lymphomatous compared to metastatic nodes, and in metastatic compared to non-malignant nodes with a standardized mean difference of -1.36 (95% CI: -1.71 to -1.01, p<0.0001) and -1.61 (95% CI: -2.19 to -1.04, p<0.0001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, applying ADC threshold could differentiate lymphomatous from metastatic lymphadenopathy with DOR of 52.07 (95% CI 25.45-106.54) and sROC AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.896-0.979) and differentiate metastatic from non-malignant nodes with DOR of 39.45 (95% CI 16.92-92.18) and sROC AUC of 0.929 (95% CI 0.873-0.966).ConclusionsQuantitative assessment of ADC can help with differentiation of suspicious cervical lymph nodes, particularly in those patients without prior history of malignancy or unknown primary cancer site.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 910
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative differentiation of malignant and benign thyroid nodules with multi-parameter diffusion-weighted imaging
    Zhu, Xiang
    Wang, Jia
    Wang, Yan-Chun
    Zhu, Ze-Feng
    Tang, Jian
    Wen, Xiao-Wei
    Fang, Ying
    Han, Jun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (24) : 8587 - 8598
  • [42] Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the discrimination of pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Hua, Jia
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Zhang, Xiao-Fei
    Lu, Qing
    Hu, Jia-Ni
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 24 (02) : 134 - 142
  • [43] Apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation between extra-nodal lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baba, Akira
    Kurokawa, Ryo
    Kurokawa, Mariko
    Rivera-de Choudens, Roberto
    Srinivasan, Ashok
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2024, 65 (05) : 449 - 454
  • [44] Diffusion-weighted imaging for staging chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Haitian
    Zhou, Zhangjian
    Li, Xiang
    Li, Chenxia
    Wang, Rong
    Zhang, Yuelang
    Niu, Gang
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1091)
  • [45] Diagnostic Performances of ADC Value in Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions in 1.5 T: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dkhar, Winniecia
    Kadavigere, Rajagopal
    Sukumar, Suresh
    Pradhan, Abhimanyu
    Sharath, S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 43 (05) : 497 - 507
  • [46] Diagnostic Performances of ADC Value in Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions in 1.5 T: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Winniecia Dkhar
    Rajagopal Kadavigere
    Suresh Sukumar
    Abhimanyu Pradhan
    S Sharath
    Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2023, 43 : 497 - 507
  • [47] Diagnostic Yield of Diffusion-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Transient Global Amnesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lim, Su Jin
    Kim, Minjae
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Sang Yeong
    Shim, Woo Hyun
    Kim, Sang Joon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (10) : 1680 - 1689
  • [48] Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wielema, M.
    Dorrius, M. D.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    De Bock, G. H.
    Baltzer, P. A. T.
    Oudkerk, M.
    Sijens, P. E.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05):
  • [49] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Detected Ischemic Lesions following Endovascular Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bond, K. M.
    Brinjikji, W.
    Murad, M. H.
    Kallmes, D. F.
    Cloft, H. J.
    Lanzino, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (02) : 304 - 309
  • [50] Non-Gaussian Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Feasibility Study
    Jansen, J. F. A.
    Stambuk, H. E.
    Koutcher, J. A.
    Shukla-Dave, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (04) : 741 - 748