Differentiation of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant lymphadenopathy in the neck with quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Payabvash, Seyedmehdi [1 ]
Brackett, Alexandria [2 ]
Forghani, Reza [3 ,4 ]
Malhotra, Ajay [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, Box 208042,333 Cedar St,Tompkins East 2, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Cushing Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[3] McGill Univ, Gerald Bronfman Dept Oncol, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Apparent diffusion coefficient; Metastasis; Lymphoma; Cervical lymphadenopathy; CERVICAL LYMPH-NODES; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; COEFFICIENT VALUES; HEAD; MRI; BENIGN; DISCRIMINATION; MANAGEMENT; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-019-02236-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature comparing average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies comparing average ADC of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant neck lymph nodes were included. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random-effects models. In subgroup analysis of those studies applying ADC threshold for differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathy, pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) area under the curve (AUC) were determined.ResultsA total of 27 studies with 1165 patients were included, pooling data from 225 lymphomatous, 1162 metastatic, and 1333 non-malignant cervical lymph nodes. The average ADC values were lower in lymphomatous compared to metastatic nodes, and in metastatic compared to non-malignant nodes with a standardized mean difference of -1.36 (95% CI: -1.71 to -1.01, p<0.0001) and -1.61 (95% CI: -2.19 to -1.04, p<0.0001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, applying ADC threshold could differentiate lymphomatous from metastatic lymphadenopathy with DOR of 52.07 (95% CI 25.45-106.54) and sROC AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.896-0.979) and differentiate metastatic from non-malignant nodes with DOR of 39.45 (95% CI 16.92-92.18) and sROC AUC of 0.929 (95% CI 0.873-0.966).ConclusionsQuantitative assessment of ADC can help with differentiation of suspicious cervical lymph nodes, particularly in those patients without prior history of malignancy or unknown primary cancer site.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 910
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic performance of simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Yuqi
    Ye, Zheng
    Lv, Xinyang
    Zhang, Yiteng
    Zhang, Meng
    Xia, Chunchao
    Li, Zhenlin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 98 (1166) : 201 - 209
  • [32] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bazzi, Khalil
    Wong, Eugene
    Jufas, Nicholas
    Patel, Nirmal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 118 : 90 - 96
  • [33] Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pulmonary malignant lesions: a meta-analysis
    Chang, Ning
    Wang, Xiao-Hui
    Cui, Long-Biao
    Yin, Hong
    Jiang, Tao
    Chen, Fu-lin
    Liu, Li-Peng
    Zhang, Jian
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (06) : 738 - +
  • [34] Diffusion-weighted imaging of focal renal lesions: a meta-analysis
    Lassel, E. A.
    Rao, R.
    Schwenke, C.
    Schoenberg, S. O.
    Michaely, H. J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 241 - 249
  • [35] Prediction of poor outcome after hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by diffusion-weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei, Ruili
    Wang, Chaonan
    He, Fangping
    Hong, Lirong
    Zhang, Jie
    Bao, Wangxiao
    Meng, Fangxia
    Luo, Benyan
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [36] The Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Lee, So-Yeon
    Shin, Yu Ri
    Park, Chang Suk
    Kim, Kijun
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [37] The Diagnosis of Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes of Breast Cancer By Diffusion Weighted Imaging: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wei Fan Sui
    Xiang Chen
    Zhen Kun Peng
    Jing Ye
    Jing Tao Wu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14
  • [38] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Surov, Alexey
    Meyer, Hans Jonas
    Wienke, Andreas
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9
  • [39] Diagnosing osteomyelitis in diabetic foot by diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wudhikulprapan, W.
    Phinyo, P.
    Hadi, A.
    Kanthawang, T.
    Choudur, H. N.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 79 (11) : 805 - 817
  • [40] Characterization of pediatric head and neck masses with quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging and measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients
    Baiomy, Ali
    Nada, Ayman
    Gabr, Ahmed
    Youssef, Ayda
    Mahmoud, Esmat
    Zaky, Iman
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2020, 30 (04) : 473 - 481