Differentiation of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant lymphadenopathy in the neck with quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Payabvash, Seyedmehdi [1 ]
Brackett, Alexandria [2 ]
Forghani, Reza [3 ,4 ]
Malhotra, Ajay [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, Box 208042,333 Cedar St,Tompkins East 2, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Cushing Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[3] McGill Univ, Gerald Bronfman Dept Oncol, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Apparent diffusion coefficient; Metastasis; Lymphoma; Cervical lymphadenopathy; CERVICAL LYMPH-NODES; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; COEFFICIENT VALUES; HEAD; MRI; BENIGN; DISCRIMINATION; MANAGEMENT; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-019-02236-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature comparing average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies comparing average ADC of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant neck lymph nodes were included. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random-effects models. In subgroup analysis of those studies applying ADC threshold for differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathy, pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) area under the curve (AUC) were determined.ResultsA total of 27 studies with 1165 patients were included, pooling data from 225 lymphomatous, 1162 metastatic, and 1333 non-malignant cervical lymph nodes. The average ADC values were lower in lymphomatous compared to metastatic nodes, and in metastatic compared to non-malignant nodes with a standardized mean difference of -1.36 (95% CI: -1.71 to -1.01, p<0.0001) and -1.61 (95% CI: -2.19 to -1.04, p<0.0001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, applying ADC threshold could differentiate lymphomatous from metastatic lymphadenopathy with DOR of 52.07 (95% CI 25.45-106.54) and sROC AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.896-0.979) and differentiate metastatic from non-malignant nodes with DOR of 39.45 (95% CI 16.92-92.18) and sROC AUC of 0.929 (95% CI 0.873-0.966).ConclusionsQuantitative assessment of ADC can help with differentiation of suspicious cervical lymph nodes, particularly in those patients without prior history of malignancy or unknown primary cancer site.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 910
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Diagnosis of Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes of Breast Cancer By Diffusion Weighted Imaging: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Sui, Wei Fan
    Chen, Xiang
    Peng, Zhen Kun
    Ye, Jing
    Wu, Jing Tao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14
  • [22] Discrimination between malignant and benign thyroid tumors by diffusion-weighted imaging-A systematic review and meta analysis
    Meyer, Hans-Jonas
    Wienke, Andreas
    Surov, Alexey
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 84 : 41 - 57
  • [23] Diffusion-weighted imaging for determining response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bilreiro, Carlos
    Andrade, Luisa
    Marques, Rui Mateus
    Matos, Celso
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (05) : 3238 - 3248
  • [24] The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Chen Jie
    Liu Rongbo
    Tan Ping
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (08) : 1929 - 1941
  • [25] Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Colorectal Cancer Detection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xiao, Yunfei
    Li, Juan
    Zhong, Jiamei
    Chen, Dequan
    Shi, Jianbo
    Jin, Hongrui
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [26] Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions
    Xin Chen
    Wen-ling Li
    Yi-li Zhang
    Qian Wu
    You-min Guo
    Zhi-lan Bai
    BMC Cancer, 10
  • [27] A meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging on ovarian cancer
    Dai, Guidong
    Liang, Kali
    Xiao, Zhengyuan
    Yang, Qin
    Yang, Shugen
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (06): : 2333 - 2340
  • [28] Meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of renal lesions
    Li, Yang
    Wang, Ye
    Qin, Jun
    Wu, Junyi
    Dai, Xueming
    Xu, Junming
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2018, 52 : 264 - 272
  • [29] On the Utility of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging as a Tool in Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Thyroid Nodules
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Chen, Xiao-Xi
    Li, Yu-Lai
    Hua, Jia
    Chen, Jie
    Hu, Jiani
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 355 - 363
  • [30] The clinical utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosing and predicting treatment response of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parsaei, Mohammadamin
    Moghaddam, Hossein Sanjari
    Mazaheri, Parisa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 177