Differentiation of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant lymphadenopathy in the neck with quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
作者
Payabvash, Seyedmehdi [1 ]
Brackett, Alexandria [2 ]
Forghani, Reza [3 ,4 ]
Malhotra, Ajay [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, Box 208042,333 Cedar St,Tompkins East 2, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Cushing Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[3] McGill Univ, Gerald Bronfman Dept Oncol, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Apparent diffusion coefficient; Metastasis; Lymphoma; Cervical lymphadenopathy; CERVICAL LYMPH-NODES; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; COEFFICIENT VALUES; HEAD; MRI; BENIGN; DISCRIMINATION; MANAGEMENT; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-019-02236-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature comparing average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.MethodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies comparing average ADC of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant neck lymph nodes were included. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random-effects models. In subgroup analysis of those studies applying ADC threshold for differentiation of cervical lymphadenopathy, pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) area under the curve (AUC) were determined.ResultsA total of 27 studies with 1165 patients were included, pooling data from 225 lymphomatous, 1162 metastatic, and 1333 non-malignant cervical lymph nodes. The average ADC values were lower in lymphomatous compared to metastatic nodes, and in metastatic compared to non-malignant nodes with a standardized mean difference of -1.36 (95% CI: -1.71 to -1.01, p<0.0001) and -1.61 (95% CI: -2.19 to -1.04, p<0.0001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, applying ADC threshold could differentiate lymphomatous from metastatic lymphadenopathy with DOR of 52.07 (95% CI 25.45-106.54) and sROC AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.896-0.979) and differentiate metastatic from non-malignant nodes with DOR of 39.45 (95% CI 16.92-92.18) and sROC AUC of 0.929 (95% CI 0.873-0.966).ConclusionsQuantitative assessment of ADC can help with differentiation of suspicious cervical lymph nodes, particularly in those patients without prior history of malignancy or unknown primary cancer site.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 910
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differentiation of lymphomatous, metastatic, and non-malignant lymphadenopathy in the neck with quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seyedmehdi Payabvash
    Alexandria Brackett
    Reza Forghani
    Ajay Malhotra
    Neuroradiology, 2019, 61 : 897 - 910
  • [2] Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Neck Neoplastic Lesions Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Gamaleldin, Omneya
    Iannella, Giannicola
    Cavalcanti, Luca
    Desouky, Salaheldin
    Shama, Sherif
    Gamaleldin, Amel
    Elwany, Yasmine
    Magliulo, Giuseppe
    Greco, Antonio
    Pace, Annalisa
    Virgilio, Armando De
    Maniaci, Antonino
    Lavalle, Salvatore
    Messineo, Daniela
    Bahgat, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2024, 10 (10)
  • [3] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Meyer, Hans-Jonas
    Wienke, Andreas
    Surov, Alexey
    BREAST CARE, 2022, 17 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [4] Accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, MeiLin
    Zhang, ChuanDe
    Yan, JingXin
    Sun, Ju
    Zhao, XinYi
    Zhang, LuShun
    Yin, LongLin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (10) : 7746 - 7759
  • [5] Applying Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Detect Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Abdomen: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Wei Fan Sui
    Xiang Chen
    Zhen Kun Peng
    Jing Tao Wu
    Applied Magnetic Resonance, 2016, 47 : 951 - 963
  • [6] Applying Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Detect Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Abdomen: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Sui, Wei Fan
    Chen, Xiang
    Peng, Zhen Kun
    Wu, Jing Tao
    APPLIED MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2016, 47 (09) : 951 - 963
  • [7] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Quantitative Differentiation of Breast Tumors: A Meta-Analysis
    Liang, Jianye
    Zeng, Sihui
    Li, Zhipeng
    Kong, Yanan
    Meng, Tiebao
    Zhou, Chunyan
    Chen, Jieting
    Wu, YaoPan
    He, Ni
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [8] The Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Suh, C. H.
    Choi, Y. J.
    Baek, J. H.
    Lee, J. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (10) : 1889 - 1895
  • [9] Liver fibrosis staging with diffusion-weighted imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Chen, Jie
    Gao, Ronghui
    Huang, Zixing
    Wu, Mingpeng
    Song, Bin
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (02) : 490 - 501
  • [10] Diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A systematic review
    Driessen, Juliette P.
    van Kempen, Paulina M. W.
    van der Heijden, Geert J.
    Philippens, Marielle E. P.
    Pameijer, Frank A.
    Stegeman, Inge
    Terhaard, Chris H. J.
    Janssen, Luuk M.
    Grolman, Wilko
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (03): : 440 - 448