Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic Properties of Naloxone Following the Use of FDA-Approved Intranasal and Intramuscular Devices Versus a Common Improvised Nasal Naloxone Device

被引:27
作者
Krieter, Philip A. [1 ,2 ]
Chiang, C. Nora [1 ,2 ]
Gyaw, Shwe [1 ,2 ]
McCann, David J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NIDA, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
intranasal; naloxone; opioid overdose; pharmacokinetics; OVERDOSE;
D O I
10.1002/jcph.1401
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
For more than a decade, first responders and the general public have been able to treat suspected opioid overdoses using an improvised nasal naloxone device (INND) constructed from a prefilled syringe containing 2 mg of naloxone (1 mg/mL) attached to a mucosal atomization device. In recent years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved Ezvio, an autoinjector that delivers 2 mg by intramuscular injection and Narcan nasal spray (2- and 4-mg strengths; 0.1 mL/dose) for the emergency treatment of a known or suspected opioid overdose. The present study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of naloxone using the FDA-approved devices (each administered once) and either 1 or 2 administrations using the INND. When naloxone was administered twice using the improvised device, the doses were separated by 2 minutes. The highest maximum plasma concentration was achieved using the 4-mg FDA-approved spray. The highest exposures at 5 minutes postdose, based on AUC values, were after administration with the autoinjector and the 4-mg FDA-approved spray; at 10, 15, and 20 minutes postdose, the latter yielded the greatest exposure. Even after 2 administrations, the INND failed to achieve naloxone plasma levels comparable to the FDA-approved devices at any time. The ease of use and higher plasma concentrations achieved using the 4-mg FDA-approved spray, compared with the INND, should be considered when deciding which naloxone device to use.
引用
收藏
页码:1078 / 1084
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and novel synthetic opioids: A comprehensive review [J].
Armenian, Patil ;
Vo, Kathy T. ;
Barr-Walker, Jill ;
Lynch, Kara L. .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 134 :121-132
[2]  
Costantino H.R., 2007, Int. J. Pharm, V337, P1
[3]   Comparative Usability Study of a Novel Auto-Injector and an Intranasal System for Naloxone Delivery [J].
Edwards E.T. ;
Edwards E.S. ;
Davis E. ;
Mulcare M. ;
Wiklund M. ;
Kelley G. .
Pain and Therapy, 2015, 4 (1) :89-105
[4]   Multiple Naloxone Administrations Among Emergency Medical Service Providers is Increasing [J].
Faul, Mark ;
Lurie, Peter ;
Kinsman, Jeremiah M. ;
Dailey, Michael W. ;
Crabaugh, Charmaine ;
Sasser, Scott M. .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2017, 21 (04) :411-419
[5]  
GARDOCKI JF, 1964, TOXICOL APPL PHARM, V6, P48, DOI 10.1016/0041-008X(64)90021-3
[6]  
International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH), 1996, CONS GOOD CLIN PRACT
[7]   Incidence of Naloxone Redosing in the Age of the New Opioid Epidemic [J].
Klebacher, Ronald ;
Harris, Matthew I. ;
Ariyaprakai, Navin ;
Tagore, Ammundeep ;
Robbins, Vince ;
Dudley, Larissa Sophia ;
Bauter, Robert ;
Koneru, Susmith ;
Hill, Ryan D. ;
Wasserman, Eric ;
Shanes, Andrew ;
Merlin, Mark A. .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2017, 21 (06) :682-687
[8]   Pharmacokinetic Properties and Human Use Characteristics of an FDA-Approved Intranasal Naloxone Product for the Treatment of Opioid Overdose [J].
Krieter, Philip ;
Chiang, Nora ;
Gyaw, Shwe ;
Skolnick, Phil ;
Crystal, Roger ;
Keegan, Fintan ;
Aker, Julie ;
Beck, Melissa ;
Harris, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 56 (10) :1243-1253
[9]   Narcan or Nar-can't: Tips and Tricks to Safely Reversing Opioid Toxicity [J].
Li, Kai ;
Armenian, Patil ;
Mason, Jessica ;
Grock, Andrew .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (01) :9-11
[10]   NASAL ADMINISTRATION OF NALOXONE IS AS EFFECTIVE AS THE INTRAVENOUS ROUTE IN OPIATE ADDICTS [J].
LOIMER, N ;
HOFMANN, P ;
CHAUDHRY, HR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1994, 29 (06) :819-827