Pareto Optimal Decisions in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Explained with Construction Cost Cases

被引:23
作者
Anysz, Hubert [1 ]
Nical, Aleksander [1 ]
Stevic, Zeljko [2 ]
Grzegorzewski, Michal [1 ]
Sikora, Karol [3 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, PL-00637 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ East Sarajevo, Fac Transport & Traff Engn, Doboj 74000, Bosnia & Herceg
[3] Univ Wollongong Dubai, Fac Engn & Informat Sci, Dubai Knowledge Pk, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2021年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
multi-criteria decision making; MCDM; AHP; TOPSIS; FUCOM; MARCOS; cost criterion; construction cost; life cycle cost; LCC; MCDM-CCAF; SELECTION; MODEL; CRITERIA; LOGISTICS; PROJECT; WALLS;
D O I
10.3390/sym13010046
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems the decision-maker is often forced to accept a not ideal solution. If the ideal choice exists, it would be certainly chosen. The acceptance of a non- ideal solution leads to some inadequate properties in the chosen solution. MCDM methods help the decision-maker to structure his needs considering different units, in which the properties of the solutions are expressed. Secondly, with MCDM tools the assessment of the available solutions can be calculated with consideration of the decision-maker's needs. The incorporation of the cost criterion into the decision maker's preferences calculation, and the solution assessment calculation, deprives the decision-maker of the ability to calculate the financial result of the decision he must make. A new multi-criteria decision making with cost criterion analysed at the final stage (MCDM-CCAF) method is developed based on principle of Pareto optimal decisions. It is proposed to exclude the cost criterion from the MCDM analysis and consider it at the final phase of the decision-making process. It is illustrated by example solutions with consideration of cost criterion and without it. It is proposed to apply the invented post-processing method to all MCDM analyses where the cost criterion of analysed variants is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW HYBRID MULTI CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD FOR A CAR SELECTION SCENARIO [J].
Ali, Yousaf ;
Mehmood, Bilal ;
Huzaifa, Muhammad ;
Yasir, Umair ;
Khan, Amin Ullah .
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (03) :357-373
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[3]  
Anysz H., 2015, TTS, V12, P57
[4]   Feature Importance of Stabilised Rammed Earth Components Affecting the Compressive Strength Calculated with Explainable Artificial Intelligence Tools [J].
Anysz, Hubert ;
Brzozowski, Lukasz ;
Kretowicz, Wojciech ;
Narloch, Piotr .
MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (10)
[5]   Model for Selection of the Best Location Based on Fuzzy AHP and Hurwitz Methods [J].
Arsovski, Slavko ;
Todorovic, Gordana ;
Lazic, Zorica ;
Arsovski, Zora ;
Ljepava, Nikolina ;
Aleksic, Aleksandar .
MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017
[6]  
Badi I., 2019, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.31181/ORESTA1901001B
[7]   Group decision making process for early stage evaluations of infrastructure projects using extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment [J].
Belosevic, Ivan ;
Kosijer, Milana ;
Ivic, Milos ;
Pavlovic, Norbert .
EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2018, 10 (02)
[8]  
Blagojevic A., 2020, Oper. Res. Eng. Sci.: Theor. Applic., V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.31181/ORESTA2003001B
[9]   Multi-objective decision-making for road design [J].
Brauers, Willem Karel M. ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Peldschus, Friedel ;
Turskis, Zenonas .
TRANSPORT, 2008, 23 (03) :183-193
[10]  
Bucon R., 2016, ENG STRUCTURES TECHN, V8, P15