Is extraordinary prosocial behavior more valuable than ordinary prosocial behavior?

被引:8
作者
Futamura, Ikumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Educ & Human Dev, Chikusa Ku, Furo Cho, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
COMPETENCE; MORALITY; SOCIABILITY; COOPERATION; ALTRUISM; KINDNESS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0196340
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study examined how people evaluate ordinary and extraordinary prosocial behaviors, especially their predictions of the likelihood of future prosocial behaviors of ordinary and extraordinary prosocial actors (Study 1). Further, it examined the individual effects of ordinary and extraordinary prosocial behaviors of an actor on the evaluation of his/her trait by considering the cases where the actor engages in and does not engage in the other behavior (Study 2). Study 1 revealed that the likelihood of future prosocial behaviors of ordinary and extraordinary prosocial actors was perceived asymmetrically. Specifically, while the likelihood of ordinary prosocial actors to engage in ordinary prosocial behaviors was perceived as high, the same perception was not observed for extraordinary prosocial behaviors. On the other hand, extraordinary prosocial actors were perceived as highly likely to engage in both ordinary and extraordinary prosocial behaviors. Study 2 revealed that the evaluation of actors who engaged in extraordinary prosocial behaviors but not ordinary prosocial behaviors did not exceed the evaluation of actors who engaged in ordinary prosocial behaviors but not extraordinary prosocial behaviors. Additionally, the effect of extraordinary prosocial behaviors was more when the actor also engaged in ordinary prosocial behaviors. These results suggest that extraordinary prosocial actors are evaluated highly when they also engage in ordinary prosocial behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   On the relationship of emotional abilities and prosocial behavior [J].
Kaltvvasser, Laura ;
Hildebrandt, Andrea ;
Wilhelm, Oliver ;
Sommer, Werner .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 38 (03) :298-308
[32]   Effect of power on conspicuous prosocial behavior [J].
Yao Qi ;
Wu Zhangjian ;
Zhang Changqing ;
Fu Guoqun .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 52 (12) :1421-1435
[33]   The Role of Guilt and Empathy on Prosocial Behavior [J].
Abbate, Costanza Scaffidi ;
Misuraca, Raffaella ;
Roccella, Michele ;
Parisi, Lucia ;
Vetri, Luigi ;
Miceli, Silvana .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (03)
[34]   The Prosocial Driver of Ecological Behavior: The Need for an Integrated Approach to Prosocial and Environmental Education [J].
Neaman, Alexander ;
Pensini, Pamela ;
Zabel, Sarah ;
Otto, Siegmar ;
Ermakov, Dmitry S. ;
Dovletyarova, Elvira A. ;
Burnham, Elliot ;
Castro, Monica ;
Navarro-Villarroel, Claudia .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (07)
[35]   The development of prosocial behavior-from sympathy to strategy [J].
Grueneisen, Sebastian ;
Warneken, Felix .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 43 :323-328
[36]   Personality and Prosocial Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis [J].
Kline, Reuben ;
Bankert, Alexa ;
Levitan, Lindsey ;
Kraft, Patrick .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2019, 7 (01) :125-142
[37]   Catholic guilt? Recall of confession promotes prosocial behavior [J].
McKay, Ryan ;
Herold, Jenna ;
Whitehouse, Harvey .
RELIGION BRAIN & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 3 (03) :201-209
[38]   Collective action in action: Prosocial behavior in and out of the laboratory [J].
Gurven, Michael ;
Winking, Jeffrey .
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 2008, 110 (02) :179-190
[39]   To be (or not to be) elevated? Group membership, moral models, and prosocial behavior [J].
Telesca, Giovanni ;
Rullo, Marika ;
Pagliaro, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 20 (01) :111-122
[40]   From Faces to Prosocial Behavior: Cues, Tools, and Mechanisms [J].
Adolphs, Ralph ;
Tusche, Anita .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 26 (03) :282-287