Brief fear of negative evaluation scale - Revised

被引:203
作者
Carleton, R. Nicholas
McCreary, Donald R.
Norton, Peter J.
Asmundson, Gordon J. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Anxiety & Illness Behav Lab, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[2] York Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX USA
关键词
social anxiety; FNE; BFNE; revised BFNE; BFNE-II;
D O I
10.1002/da.20142
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Rodebaugh et al. [2004: Psychol Assess 2:169-181] recently performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (BFAE; Leary, 1983: Psychol Bull 9:371-375]. Their study resulted in the emergence of a two-factor solution comprising straightforwardly worded items and reverse-worded items. They concluded by recommending use of only the straightforwardly worded items in the BFNE. Our intent in this study was to evaluate this recommendation through replication and extension. Participants included 385 undergraduates from the Universities of Regina and Houston, who provided responses to a questionnaire battery including either the BFNE or a revision utilizing straightforwardly worded versions of the reverse-worded items (BFNE-II). A CFA of the BFNE, using the two-factor model proposed by Rodebaugh et al., supported their conclusion that the reverse-worded items comprise a separate, methodologically based factor. However, CFA of the BFNE-II resulted in an acceptable unitary model that conforms to the theoretical basis for the BFNE, without risking loss of sensitivity from item removal. Additional analyses suggest use of the BFNE-II rather than a shortened form.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 303
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条