The COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: Policy and technology impact on health and non-health outcomes

被引:17
作者
Berardi, Chiara [1 ]
Antonini, Marcello [2 ]
Genie, Mesfin G. [3 ]
Cotugno, Giovanni
Lanteri, Alessandro [4 ]
Melia, Adrian [1 ]
Paolucci, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Fac Business & Law, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Econ Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Hult Int Business Sch, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Health policy; Healthcare; Health technology; Pandemic;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.019
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Italy was the first Western country to experience a major coronavirus outbreak and conse-quently faced large-scale health and socio-economic challenges. The Italian government enforced a wide set of homogeneous interventions nationally, despite the differing incidences of the virus throughout the country. Objective: The paper aims to analyse the policies implemented by the government and their impact on health and non-health outcomes considering both scaling-up and scaling-down interventions. Methods: To categorise the policy interventions, we rely on the comparative and conceptual framework developed by Moy et al. (2020). We investigate the impact of policies on the daily reported number of deaths, case fatality rate, confirmation rate, intensive care unit saturation, and financial and job market indicators across the three major geographical areas of Italy (North, Centre, and South). Qualitative and quantitative data are gathered from mixed sources: Italian national and regional institutions, National Health Research and international organisations. Our analysis contributes to the literature on the COVID19 pandemic by comparing policy interventions and their outcomes. Results: Our findings suggest that the strictness and timing of containment and prevention measures played a prominent role in tackling the pandemic, both from a health and economic perspective. Technological interventions played a marginal role due to the inadequacy of protocols and the delay of their implementation. Conclusions: Future government interventions should be informed by evidence-based decision making to balance, the benefits arising from the timing and stringency of the interventions against the adverse social and economic cost, both in the short and long term. (c) 2020 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 487
页数:34
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Anderson J., FISCAL RESPONSE EC F
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V78, P868
[3]  
[Anonymous], POP STRUCT AG 2019
[4]  
[Anonymous], CORONAVIRUS SI ESTEN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, OSSERVATORIO SUICIDI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, COMMERCIO ESTERO PRE
[7]  
[Anonymous], COMM DETT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, STAT HLTH EU
[9]  
Bloom N., 2020, W26945 NAT BUR EC RE
[10]   Geographical tracking and mapping of coronavirus disease COVID-19/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic and associated events around the world: how 21st century GIS technologies are supporting the global fight against outbreaks and epidemics [J].
Boulos, Maged N. ;
Geraghty, Estella M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, 2020, 19 (01)