An ontology-based distributed whiteboard to determine legal responses to online cyber attacks

被引:1
作者
Peng, Leisheng [1 ]
Wijesekera, Duminda
Wingfield, Thomas C.
Michael, James B.
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Informat & Software Engn, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] Potomac Inst Policy Studies, Arlington, VA USA
[3] USN, Postgrad Sch, Dept Comp Sci, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
关键词
systems theory; law; decision support systems; worldwide web;
D O I
10.1108/10662240610710969
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to assist investigators and attorneys addressing the legal aspects of cyber incidents, and allow them to determine the legality of a response to cyber attacks by using the Worldwide web securely. Design/methodology/approach - Develop a decision support legal whiteboard that graphically constructs legal arguments as a decision tree. The tree is constructed using a tree of questions and appending legal documents to substantiate the answers that are known to hold in anticipated legal challenges. Findings - The tool allows participating group of attorneys to meet in cyberspace in real time and construct a legal argument graphically by using a decision tree. They can construct sub-parts of the tree from their own legal domains. Because diverse legal domains use different nomenclatures, this tool provides the user the capability to index and search legal documents using a complex international legal ontology that goes beyond the traditional LexisNexis-like legal databases. This ontology itself can be created using the tool from distributed locations. Originality/value - This tool has been fine-tuned through numerous interviews with attorneys teaching and practicing in the area of cyber crime, cyber espionage, and military operations in cyberspace. It can be used to guide forensic experts and law enforcement personnel during their active responses and off-line examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 490
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Curran K., 2000, J INFORM LAW TECHNOL, V3
[2]  
DUGUID S, 2001, J LAW COMPUTERS TECH, V15, P265
[3]  
Gangemi A., 2003, P WORKSH REG ONT MOD, P607
[4]  
HAFNER C, 2001, INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA
[5]   The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: Teleological, temporal, and procedural [J].
Hafner C.D. ;
Berman D.H. .
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers (10) :19-64
[6]  
HALL MJJ, 2002, P 6 E EUR C ADV DAT, V1, P108
[7]  
HUYGEN P, 2002, P 7 BRIT IR LEG ED T
[8]  
KATSH E, 2003, ARTIF INTELL, V11, P69
[9]  
MICHAEL JB, 2003, P IFIP 18 INT INF SE, P483
[10]  
MICHAEL JB, 2002, P 26 ANN COMP SOFTW, V8, P957