OSAKA Trial: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tacrolimus QD and BD in Kidney Transplantation

被引:72
作者
Albano, Laetitia [1 ]
Banas, Bernhard [2 ]
Klempnauer, Juergen L. [3 ]
Glyda, Maciej [4 ]
Viklicky, Ondrej [5 ]
Kamar, Nassim [6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Nice, Dept Nephrol, F-06202 Nice, France
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Regensburg, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Hannover, Germany
[4] Dist Publ Hosp, Dept Transplantol & Surg, Poznan, Poland
[5] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Nephrol, Prague, Czech Republic
[6] Toulouse Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol Dialysis & Organ Transplantat, F-31059 Toulouse 9, France
关键词
Tacrolimus; Kidney transplantation; Extended-criteria donor; Composite endpoint for graft failure; ONCE-DAILY TACROLIMUS; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS; PHASE-III; RECIPIENTS; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; ADHERENCE; VARIABILITY; FORMULATION; REGIMENS;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a203bd
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The once-daily (QD), prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus has been shown to improve adherence versus twice-daily (BD) tacrolimus. Treatment nonadherence in transplant recipients has been associated with poor graft outcomes. Methods. This open-label, parallel-group study randomized adults with end-stage renal disease undergoing primary kidney transplantation or retransplantation to an initial dose of tacrolimus BD 0.2 mg/kg per day (Arm 1; n=309), QD 0.2 mg/kg per day (Arm 2; n=302), QD 0.3 mg/kg per day (Arm 3; n=304) all with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids (tapered) over 24 weeks, or tacrolimus QD 0.2 mg/kg per day with mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, and corticosteroids given only perioperatively (Arm 4; n=283). The primary composite endpoint (efficacy failure; per protocol set) was defined as graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, or graft dysfunction at week 24. Graft dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4 formula of less than 40 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The prespecified noninferiority margin was 12.5%. Results. The per protocol set included 976 patients: 237, 263, 246, and 230 patients in Arms 1 to 4, respectively. Noninferiority of the composite endpoint was demonstrated for Arm 2 versus Arm 1; Kaplan-Meier estimates of efficacy failure were 42.2% and 40.6%, respectively (difference, -1.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12.2% to 9.0%). Noninferiority to Arm 1 was not confirmed for Arm 3 (difference, -3.5%; 95% CI, -13.6% to 6.6%) or Arm 4 (difference, -7.1%; 95% CI, -16.1% to 1.9%). Graft dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was the main determinant of composite-endpoint efficacy failure across all arms. Conclusions. In patients representative of the European kidney transplant population, tacrolimus QD-based immunosuppression (0.2 mg/kg/day), without induction, showed similar efficacy to 0.2 mg/kg per day tacrolimus BD.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 903
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Efficacy, safety, and immunosuppressant adherence in stable liver transplant patients converted from a twice-daily tacrolimus-based regimen to once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation [J].
Beckebaum, Susanne ;
Iacob, Speranta ;
Sweid, Dani ;
Sotiropoulos, Georgios C. ;
Saner, Fuat ;
Kaiser, Gernot ;
Radtke, Arnold ;
Klein, Christian G. ;
Erim, Yesim ;
de Geest, Sabina ;
Paul, Andreas ;
Gerken, Guido ;
Cicinnati, Vito R. .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (07) :666-675
[2]   High within-patient variability in the clearance of tacrolimus is a risk factor for poor long-term outcome after kidney transplantation [J].
Borra, Lennaert C. P. ;
Roodnat, Joke I. ;
Kal, Judith A. ;
Mathot, Ron A. A. ;
Weimar, Willem ;
van Gelder, Teun .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 25 (08) :2757-2763
[3]  
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, 2008, CHMPEWP26314806
[4]   Effect of immunosuppression on damage, leukocyte infiltration, and regeneration after servere warm ischemia/reperfusion renal injury [J].
De Greef, KE ;
Ysebaert, DK ;
Vercauteren, SR ;
Chapelle, T ;
Roeyen, G ;
Bosmans, JL ;
Verpooten, GA ;
De Broe, ME .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (03) :791-794
[5]   Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation [J].
Ekberg, Henrik ;
Tedesco-Silva, Helio ;
Demirbas, Alper ;
Vitko, Stefan ;
Nashan, Bjorn ;
Guerkan, Alp ;
Margreiter, Raimund ;
Hugo, Christian ;
Grinyo, Josep M. ;
Frei, Ulrich ;
Vanrenterghem, Yves ;
Daloze, Pierre ;
Halloran, Philip F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (25) :2562-2575
[6]  
European Medicines Agency, 2012, CHMP PHARM WORK PART
[7]   Efficacy and Safety of Conversion from Twice-daily to Once-daily Tacrolimus in a Large Cohort of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients [J].
Guirado, L. ;
Cantarell, C. ;
Franco, A. ;
Huertas, E. G. ;
Fructuoso, A. S. ;
Fernandez, A. ;
Gentil, M. A. ;
Rodriguez, A. ;
Paul, J. ;
Torregrossa, J. V. ;
Rodriguez, A. ;
Alonso, A. ;
Hernandez, D. ;
Burgos, D. ;
Jimenez, C. ;
Jimeno, L. ;
Lauzurica, R. ;
Mazuecos, A. ;
Osuna, A. ;
Plumed, J. S. ;
Ruiz, J. C. ;
Zarraga, S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (09) :1965-1971
[8]   Tacrolimus Once Daily (ADVAGRAF) Versus Twice Daily (PROGRAF) in De Novo Renal Transplantation: A Randomized Phase III Study [J].
Kraemer, B. K. ;
Charpentier, B. ;
Backman, L. ;
Silva, H. Tedesco, Jr. ;
Mondragon-Ramirez, G. ;
Cassuto-Viguier, E. ;
Mourad, G. ;
Sola, R. ;
Rigotti, P. ;
Ortuno Mirete, J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 (12) :2632-2643
[9]   Improved Adherence to Tacrolimus Once-Daily Formulation in Renal Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Electronic Monitoring [J].
Kuypers, Dirk R. J. ;
Peeters, Patrick C. ;
Sennesael, Jacques J. ;
Kianda, Mireille N. ;
Vrijens, Bernard ;
Kristanto, Paulus ;
Dobbels, Fabienne ;
Vanrenterghem, Yves ;
Kanaan, Nada .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 95 (02) :333-340
[10]   Immunosuppressant treatment adherence, barriers to adherence and quality of life in renal and liver transplant recipients in Spain [J].
Morales, Jose M. ;
Varo, Evaristo ;
Lazaro, Pablo .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 26 (02) :369-376