Beyond the third dimension of BIM: A systematic review of literature and assessment of professional views

被引:148
作者
Charef, Rabia [1 ]
Alaka, Hafiz [1 ]
Emmitt, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Coventry Univ, Fac Engn, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
Building Information Modelling (BIM); 4D; 5D; 6D; 7D; Dimension; Practitioners; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; 4D BIM; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM; RESPONSE RATES; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; LIFE-CYCLE; INFORMATION; IMPLEMENTATION; INTEGRATION; WEB;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2018.04.028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Across the world, the use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and the three-dimensional (3D) model in projects are increasingly frequent for supporting design tasks. The digital data embodied in the BIM model is shared between the project stakeholders from the various disciplines. After giving an overview of the BIM 3D Model data used for planning (4D) and costing (5D), the study assesses the level of clarity or confusion on what the numbers of dimension refer to after the 5th dimension. A systematic review of the different BIM dimensions was conducted associated with an online questionnaire sent to various Architecture, Engineering and Construction stakeholders across Europe. The online questionnaire survey was limited to the 28 European Union (EU) countries. Each of the 28 EU countries was represented by at least one respondent. The research identified 52 papers considering BIM 4D Model, 15 considering 5D modelling, 6 considering the 6D Model and 2 considering the 7D. It was also identified a confusion between academics and practitioners for the 6D and 7D BIM dimensions. In fact, 86% of the professionals, actually using 6D, allocate Sustainability to 6D. Whereas 85% of the professionals using 7D allocate it to Facility Management.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 257
页数:16
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]   Integrating BIM and new rules of measurement for embodied energy and CO2 assessment [J].
Abanda, F. H. ;
Oti, A. H. ;
Tah, J. H. M. .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2017, 12 :288-305
[2]   BIM - New rules of measurement ontology for construction cost estimation [J].
Abanda, F. H. ;
Kamsu-Foguem, B. ;
Tah, J. H. M. .
ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL-JESTECH, 2017, 20 (02) :443-459
[3]   An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM (Building Information Modelling) [J].
Abanda, F. H. ;
Byers, L. .
ENERGY, 2016, 97 :517-527
[4]   Metric-based BIM implementation assessment: a review of research and practice [J].
Abdirad H. .
Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2017, 13 (01) :52-78
[5]   Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar A content comprehensiveness comparison [J].
Adriaanse, Leslie S. ;
Rensleigh, Chris .
ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2013, 31 (06) :727-744
[6]  
Aghaei Chadegani A., 2013, Asian Soc. Sci., V9, P18, DOI [10.5539/ass.v9n5p18, DOI 10.5539/ASS.V9N5P18]
[7]   Status of BIM Adoption and the BIM Experience of Cost Consultants in Australia [J].
Aibinu, Ajibade ;
Venkatesh, Sudha .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2014, 140 (03)
[8]  
Alashwal AM, 2017, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V7, P534, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0058
[9]  
[Anonymous], RES METHODS THEBASIC
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2009, RES METHODS BUSINESS