Impact of network effects on service provider performance in digital business platforms

被引:17
作者
Vakeel, Khadija Ali [1 ]
Malthouse, Edward C. [2 ]
Yang, Aimei [3 ]
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Driehaus Coll Business, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Integrated Mkt Commun, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Annenberg Sch Commun & Journalism, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
Digital business platforms; Service provider network; Network centrality; Structural hole; VALUE CO-CREATION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL HOLES; COMPETITION; CENTRALITY; INNOVATION; ECONOMICS; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1108/JOSM-04-2020-0120
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Digital business platforms (DBPs) such as Alibaba and Google Shopping are partnership networks that use the Internet to bring service providers (e.g. retail vendors) and customers together. One of the benefits of DBPs is network effects, in which customers can purchase from multiple providers, giving rise to a unique network. However, few studies have explored which service providers benefit from network effects and which do not. Design/methodology/approach Using the theories of transaction costs and network analysis, the authors apply network models to DBPs to understand which service providers benefit from network effects. Findings The authors identify three segments of service providers: (1) those with high prominence (connection to providers with high network centrality), (2) those with high network constraint (adjacent to isolated providers) and (3) those with low prominence and constraint. The authors find that segments (1) and (3) benefit from reciprocated customer exchanges, and thus benefit from network effects, while high constraint segment (2) providers do not benefit from reciprocated exchanges. Moreover, the authors find that for segments (2) and (3) future sales have a negative association with unreciprocated customer exchanges, while segment (1) has no significant association between unreciprocated exchanges and future sales. Research limitations/implications The authors discuss implications for a multisided platform (MSP), as it decides which service providers to attract, promote and recommend. They can use this study's results to know which segments of providers will increase network effects to make the platform more valuable. Practical implications This paper provides managers of service platforms with strategies for managing relations with their service providers. Social implications Service platforms are an important and disruptive business model. The authors need to understand how network effects operate to create efficient platforms. Originality/value This paper extends the literature on MSPs by quantifying network effects and showing not all service providers benefit equally on an MSP from network effects. Critical insights into network effects on the MSP are provided, including different ways it can impact provider sales.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 482
页数:22
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] The sharing economy and the future of the hotel industry: Transaction cost theory and platform economics
    Akbar, Yusaf H.
    Tracogna, Andrea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 : 91 - 101
  • [2] Business model innovation and value-creation: the triadic way
    Andreassen, Tor Wallin
    Lervik-Olsen, Line
    Snyder, Hannah
    Van Riel, Allard C. R.
    Sweeney, Jillian C.
    Van Vaerenbergh, Yves
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (05) : 883 - 906
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, SAGE HDB ORG COMMUNI
  • [4] Competition in two-sided markets
    Armstrong, Mark
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) : 668 - 691
  • [5] ECONOMICS Matching markets in the digital age
    Azevedo, Eduardo M.
    Weyl, E. Glen
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2016, 352 (6289) : 1056 - 1057
  • [6] BONACICH P, 1987, AM J SOCIOL, V92, P1170, DOI 10.1086/228631
  • [7] Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality
    Bonacich, Phillip
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2007, 29 (04) : 555 - 564
  • [8] Centrality and network flow
    Borgatti, SP
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2005, 27 (01) : 55 - 71
  • [9] Managing conflict to improve the effectiveness of retail networks
    Bradford, KD
    Stringfellow, A
    Weitz, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2004, 80 (03) : 181 - 195
  • [10] Brown S., 1991, INT J RETAIL DISTRIB, V19, P17, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/09590559110135935, DOI 10.1108/09590559110135935]