Rhythmic Auditory-Motor Entrainment Improves Hemiparetic Arm Kinematics During Reaching Movements: A Pilot Study

被引:74
作者
Malcolm, Matthew P. [1 ,2 ]
Massie, Crystal [1 ]
Thaut, Michael [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, NeuroRehabil Res Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Mol Cellular & Integrat Neurosci Program, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Ctr Biomed Res Mus, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
kinematics; motor control; rehabilitation; rhythmicity; stroke; CHRONIC STROKE; CORTICAL REORGANIZATION; THERAPY; REHABILITATION; GAIT; SYNCHRONIZATION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; GRASP;
D O I
10.1310/tsr1601-69
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recovery of skilled upper limb movement remains a critical focus of rehabilitation in individuals post stroke. Conventional treatments, however, have demonstrated limited capability to produce substantial improvements in poststroke quality of movement. Recently, rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has emerged as efficacious in improving and normalizing limb movements in neurologically impaired populations. This pilot study examined changes in pre- to post-RAS reach kinematics and functional outcomes in survivors of stroke. Method: Five individuals in the chronic poststroke phase participated in a 2-week program of RAS training. Kinematic reaching variables were trunk, shoulder, and elbow segment contribution; movement time; and reach velocity. Functional outcomes were the Wolf Motor Function Test, Motor Activity Log, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Results: Post-RAS assessment of reaching kinematics revealed a significant (p<.05) decrease in compensatory trunk movement, increase in shoulder flexion, and a slight increase in elbow extension. Movement time and velocity significantly improved post RAS. Significant gains were observed on all functional assessments. Conclusions: Post RAS, participants demonstrated substantial decreases in compensatory reaching movements. These changes in motor control strategy were paralleled by gains in functional abilities, suggesting that reduced reliance on compensatory movements may translate to improved performance of daily activities.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 79
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], HEART DIS STROK STAT
  • [2] Bhogal Sanjit K, 2003, Top Stroke Rehabil, V10, P8
  • [3] Ottawa Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for post-stroke rehabilitation
    Brosseau, Lucie
    Wells, George A.
    Finestone, Hillel M.
    Egan, Mary
    Dubouloz, Claire-Jehanne
    Graham, Ian
    Casimiro, Lynn
    Robinson, Vivian A.
    Bilodeau, Martin
    McGowan, Jessie
    Teasell, Robert
    Desrosiers, Johanne
    Barreca, Susan
    Laferriere, Lucie
    Fung, Joyce
    Corriveau, Helene
    Gubitz, Gordon
    Sharma, Michael
    U., S.
    Khadilkar, Amole
    Phillips, Karin
    Jean, Nathalie
    Lamothe, Catherine
    Milne, Sarah
    Sarnecka, Joanna
    [J]. TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2006, 13 (02) : 1 - +
  • [4] Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients
    Caimmi, Marco
    Carda, Stefano
    Giovanzana, Chiara
    Maini, Eliseo Stefano
    Sabatini, Angelo Maria
    Smania, Nicola
    Molteni, Franco
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2008, 22 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [5] Strategies for stroke rehabilitation
    Dobkin, BH
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2004, 3 (09) : 528 - 536
  • [6] MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN
    FOLSTEIN, MF
    FOLSTEIN, SE
    MCHUGH, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) : 189 - 198
  • [7] Hömberg V, 2005, ACTA NEUROCHIR SUPPL, V93, P3
  • [8] NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING PHYSIOTHERAPY IN HEMIPARETIC STROKE PATIENTS
    HUMMELSHEIM, H
    MAURITZ, KH
    [J]. FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE, 1993, 61 (06) : 208 - 216
  • [9] Rationales for improving motor function
    Hummelsheim, H
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 1999, 12 (06) : 697 - 701
  • [10] REHABILITATION OF THE STROKE PATIENT
    JEFFERY, DR
    GOOD, DC
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 1995, 8 (01) : 62 - 68