Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up

被引:54
|
作者
Lee, Sang-Ho [1 ]
Erken, H. Yener [2 ]
Bae, Junseok [1 ]
机构
[1] Spine Hlth Wooridul Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Spine Hlth Wooridul Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ARTHRODESIS; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY; DISKS;
D O I
10.1155/2017/3731983
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background. Spinal fusion has been shown to be the preferred surgical option to reduce pain, recover function, and increase quality of life in the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. The main goal of the present study is to report our clinical experience and results of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) applications using the expandable spacer in a single institution. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 18 patients with > 12-month follow-up who had been operated on PELIF using expandable spacer from 2001 to 2007. Their clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed. Results. The mean follow-up period was 46 months. The mean DH before the surgery was 8.3mm which improved to 11.4mm at the early postoperative period and regressed to 9.3mm at the last follow-up visit. The VAS-B, VAS-L, and ODI scores at the last follow-up showed a 54%, 72%, and 69% improvement fromthe preoperative period, respectively. Conclusions. The presented PELIF technique with the expandable spacer seems to be a promising surgical technique for the treatment of a variety of lumbar spinal disorders. Conversely, radiological results including disc space subsidence make the stand-alone application of the expandable spacer debatable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION: RESULTS OVER 47 MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP
    Silva, Anibal Correia
    De Alcantara, Tabata
    Nogueira, Monica Paschoal
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 30 (01):
  • [2] Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 10-Year Follow-up Results
    Roh, Young-Ho
    Lee, Jae Chul
    Hwang, Jinyeong
    Cho, Hyung-Ki
    Soh, Jaewan
    Choi, Sung-Woo
    Shin, Byung-Joon
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 37 (13)
  • [3] Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Using the Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique Compared With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spine Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes
    Zheng, Bo
    Zhang, Xiu-Li
    Li, Peng
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 24 (06) : E395 - E401
  • [4] Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up
    Park, Man-Kyu
    Park, Soo-An
    Son, Sang-Kyu
    Park, Weon-Wook
    Choi, Seung-Hyun
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 42 (03) : 753 - 761
  • [5] Clinical and Radiologic Comparisons Between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A 2-year Follow-Up Study
    Jung, Choong-Won
    Soh, Jaewan
    Park, Jin-Sung
    Park, Se-Jun
    Lee, Chong-Suh
    Kim, Hyun-Jun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 193 : 605 - 612
  • [6] Comparisons of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a prospective cohort study with a 2-year follow-up
    Wu, Jingye
    Ao, Jintao
    Xu, Zhongning
    Li, Guanqing
    Ge, Tenghui
    Wang, Yongqing
    Tao, Xiaohui
    Tian, Wei
    Sun, Yuqing
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [7] Comparison of the safety and efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: a 1-year follow-up
    Xie, Y. Z.
    Shi, Y.
    Zhou, Q.
    Feng, C. Q.
    Zhou, Y.
    Li, T.
    Yu, Y.
    Fan, X. H.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [8] Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lee, Kong Hwee
    Yue, Wai Mun
    Yeo, William
    Soeharno, Henry
    Tan, Seang Beng
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (11) : 2265 - 2270
  • [9] Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up
    Kolcun, John Paul G.
    Brusko, G. Damian
    Basil, Gregory W.
    Epstein, Richard
    Wang, Michael Y.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (04)
  • [10] Comparison of three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases: At a mean follow up time of 46 months
    Liu, Fubing
    Cao, Yuanwu
    Feng, Zhenzhou
    Zhou, Xiaogang
    Jiang, Chun
    Li, Xilei
    Chen, Zixian
    Li, Zheng
    Liang, Yun
    Jiang, Xiaoxing
    Dong, Jian
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 141 : 1 - 6