One-Millimeter Cancer-Free Margin Is Curative for Colorectal Liver Metastases A Propensity Score Case-Match Approach

被引:129
作者
Hamady, Zaed Z. R. [1 ,2 ]
Lodge, J. Peter A. [2 ]
Welsh, Fenella K. [1 ]
Toogood, Giles J. [2 ]
White, Alan [2 ]
John, Timothy [1 ]
Rees, Myrddin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hampshire Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[2] Univ Leeds, St Jamess Univ Hosp, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Transplant Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
colorectal cancer; hepatic resection; liver metastases; resection margin; HEPATIC RESECTION; SURGICAL MARGIN; RECURRENCE; HEPATECTOMY; CARCINOMA; TRANSECTION; APPRAISAL; SURVIVAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182902b6e
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate the influence of clear surgical resection margin width on disease recurrence rate after intentionally curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. Background: There is consensus that a histological positive resection margin is a predictor of disease recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases. The dispute, however, over the width of cancer-free resection margin required is ongoing. Methods: Analysis of observational prospectively collected data for 2715 patients who underwent primary resection of colorectal liver metastases from 2 major hepatobiliary units in the United Kingdom. Histological cancer-free resection margin was classified as positive (if cancer cells present at less than 1 mm from the resection margin) or negative (if the distance between the cancer and the margin is 1 mm or more). The negative margin was further classified according to the distance from the tumor in millimeters. Predictors of disease-free survival were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. A case-match analysis by a propensity score method was undertaken to reduce bias. Results: A 1-mm cancer-free resection margin was sufficient to achieve 33% 5-year overall disease-free survival. Extra margin width did not add disease-free survival advantage (P > 0.05). After the propensity case-match analysis, there is no statistical difference in disease-free survival between patients with negative narrow and wider margin clearance [hazard ratio (HR) 1.0; 95% (confidence interval) CI: 0.9-1.2; P = 0.579 at 5-mm cutoff and HR 1.1; 95% CI: 0.96-1.3; P = 0.149 at 10-mm cutoff]. Patients with extrahepatic disease and positive lymph node primary tumor did not have disease-free survival advantage despite surgical margin clearance (9 months for <1-mm vs 12 months for 1-mm margin clearance; P = 0.062). Conclusion: One-mm cancer-free resection margin achieved in patients with colorectal liver metastases should now be considered the standard of care.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Appraisal of 1 cm hepatectomy margins for intrahepatic micrometastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastasis
    Wakai, Toshifumi
    Shirai, Yoshio
    Sakata, Jun
    Valera, Vladimir A.
    Korita, Pavel V.
    Akazawa, Kouhei
    Ajioka, Yoichi
    Hatakeyama, Katsuyoshi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (09) : 2472 - 2481
  • [22] Quantification of risk of a positive (R1) resection margin following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: An aid to clinical decision-making
    Welsh, Fenella K. S.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    O'Rourke, Tom
    John, Timothy G.
    Rees, Myrddin
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2008, 17 (01): : 3 - 13
  • [23] World Health Organization (WHO), 2010, INTR WHO GLOB STAT R
  • [24] Ten common statistical errors and how to avoid them
    Zinsmeister, Alan R.
    Connor, Jason I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (02) : 262 - 266