One-Millimeter Cancer-Free Margin Is Curative for Colorectal Liver Metastases A Propensity Score Case-Match Approach

被引:129
作者
Hamady, Zaed Z. R. [1 ,2 ]
Lodge, J. Peter A. [2 ]
Welsh, Fenella K. [1 ]
Toogood, Giles J. [2 ]
White, Alan [2 ]
John, Timothy [1 ]
Rees, Myrddin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hampshire Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[2] Univ Leeds, St Jamess Univ Hosp, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Transplant Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
colorectal cancer; hepatic resection; liver metastases; resection margin; HEPATIC RESECTION; SURGICAL MARGIN; RECURRENCE; HEPATECTOMY; CARCINOMA; TRANSECTION; APPRAISAL; SURVIVAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182902b6e
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate the influence of clear surgical resection margin width on disease recurrence rate after intentionally curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. Background: There is consensus that a histological positive resection margin is a predictor of disease recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases. The dispute, however, over the width of cancer-free resection margin required is ongoing. Methods: Analysis of observational prospectively collected data for 2715 patients who underwent primary resection of colorectal liver metastases from 2 major hepatobiliary units in the United Kingdom. Histological cancer-free resection margin was classified as positive (if cancer cells present at less than 1 mm from the resection margin) or negative (if the distance between the cancer and the margin is 1 mm or more). The negative margin was further classified according to the distance from the tumor in millimeters. Predictors of disease-free survival were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. A case-match analysis by a propensity score method was undertaken to reduce bias. Results: A 1-mm cancer-free resection margin was sufficient to achieve 33% 5-year overall disease-free survival. Extra margin width did not add disease-free survival advantage (P > 0.05). After the propensity case-match analysis, there is no statistical difference in disease-free survival between patients with negative narrow and wider margin clearance [hazard ratio (HR) 1.0; 95% (confidence interval) CI: 0.9-1.2; P = 0.579 at 5-mm cutoff and HR 1.1; 95% CI: 0.96-1.3; P = 0.149 at 10-mm cutoff]. Patients with extrahepatic disease and positive lymph node primary tumor did not have disease-free survival advantage despite surgical margin clearance (9 months for <1-mm vs 12 months for 1-mm margin clearance; P = 0.062). Conclusion: One-mm cancer-free resection margin achieved in patients with colorectal liver metastases should now be considered the standard of care.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 548
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis
    Are, Chandrakanth
    Gonen, Mithat
    Zazzali, Kathleen
    DeMatteo, Ronald P.
    Jarnagin, William R.
    Fong, Yuman
    Blumgart, Leslie H.
    D'Angelica, Miehael
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (02) : 295 - 300
  • [2] Size of surgical margin does not influence recurrence rates after curative liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases
    Bodingbauer, M.
    Tamandl, D.
    Schmid, K.
    Plank, C.
    Schimai, W.
    Gruenberger, T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (09) : 1133 - 1138
  • [3] Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis - A critical and improvable determinant of outcome
    Cady, B
    Jenkins, RL
    Steele, GD
    Lewis, WD
    Stone, MD
    McDermott, WV
    Jessup, JM
    Bothe, A
    Lalor, P
    Lovett, EJ
    Lavin, P
    Linehan, DC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (04) : 566 - 571
  • [4] Impact of subcentimeter margin on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: A meta-regression approach
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    Cescon, Matteo
    Bigonzi, Eleonora
    Peri, Eugenia
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Pinna, Antonio D.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2012, 151 (05) : 691 - 699
  • [5] D'Agostino RB, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2265, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-B
  • [7] Influence of Margins on Overall Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastasis A Meta-Analysis
    Dhir, Mashaal
    Lyden, Elizabeth R.
    Wang, Antai
    Smith, Lynette M.
    Ullrich, Fred
    Are, Chandrakanth
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (02) : 234 - 242
  • [8] DETERMINANTS OF SURVIVAL IN LIVER RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL SECONDARIES
    EKBERG, H
    TRANBERG, KG
    ANDERSSON, R
    LUNDSTEDT, C
    HAGERSTRAND, I
    RANSTAM, J
    BENGMARK, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (09) : 727 - 731
  • [9] Effect of subcentimeter nonpositive resection margin on hepatic recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Evidences from 663 liver resections
    Figueras, J.
    Burdio, F.
    Ramos, E.
    Torras, J.
    Llado, L.
    Lopez-Ben, S.
    Codina-Barreras, A.
    Mojal, S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (07) : 1190 - 1195
  • [10] Resection margin in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: A critical appraisal of the 1 cm rule
    Hamady, Z. Z. R.
    Cameron, I. C.
    Wyatt, J.
    Prasad, R. K.
    Toogood, G. J.
    Lodge, J. P. A.
    [J]. EJSO, 2006, 32 (05): : 557 - 563