A factorial CGE model for analyzing the impacts of stepped carbon tax on Chinese economy and carbon emission

被引:73
作者
Fu, Yupeng [1 ]
Huang, Guohe [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Lirong [3 ]
Zhai, Mengyu [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regina, Fac Engn, Environm Syst Engn Program, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[2] Int Soc Environm Informat Sci, 9803A Jingshidasha BNU,19 Xinwaidajie, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm & Sustainabil, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[4] North China Elect Power Univ, Sino Canada Resources & Environm Res Acad, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Stepped carbon tax; Factorial analysis; Computable general equilibrium model; Carbon mitigation policy; TRADING SCHEME; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENERGY; POLICY; METABOLISM; REDUCTION; AUSTRALIA; TAXATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143512
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon tax is a powerful incentive to mitigate carbon emissions and promote energy revolutions. It is of vital importance to systematically explore and examine the socio-economic impacts of levying a carbon tax, such that desired compromises among socio-economic and environmental objectives can be identified. In order to fill the research gap on the stepped carbon tax, this study is to develop a factorial computable general equilibrium (FCGE) model for examining the interactive effects of multiple policy options (e.g., grouping of emission intensity/level, and relevant tax rates), and supporting the formulation of desired carbon-mitigation policies. It is discovered that (1) carbon tax of 18.37 to 38.25 Yuan/ton is a reasonable policy alternative for China; (2) the stepped carbon tax (high level on coal-related fuels) is more efficiency than conventional carbon tax policy; (3) the positive effects for reducing carbon emission intensity can be strengthened with an increasing step range; (4) interactive effects between stepped carbon taxes on coal-related energies and crude oil related energies should be jointly considered by the policy makers. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] An Emissions Trading Scheme for Australia: National and Regional Impacts
    Adams, Philip D.
    Parmenter, Brian R.
    Verikios, George
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2014, 90 (290) : 316 - 344
  • [2] The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: A computable general equilibrium analysis
    Allan, Grant
    Lecca, Patrizio
    McGregor, Peter
    Swales, Kim
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 100 : 40 - 50
  • [3] Biofuels and economic development: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Tanzania
    Arndt, Channing
    Pauw, Karl
    Thurlow, James
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (06) : 1922 - 1930
  • [4] Considering environmental costs of greenhouse gas emissions for setting a CO2 tax: A review
    Bachmann, Till M.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 720
  • [5] Mixed Integer Linear Programming for Oil Sands Production Planning and Tailings Management
    Badiozamani, M. M.
    Ben-Awuah, E.
    Askari-Nasab, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 33 (02) : 96 - 104
  • [6] Are all jobs created equal? Regional employment impacts of a US carbon tax
    Brown, Marilyn A.
    Li, Yufei
    Soni, Anmol
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 262
  • [7] Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France
    Bureau, Benjamin
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (01) : 121 - 130
  • [8] Fine Resolution Carbon Dioxide Emission Gridded Data and Their Application for China
    Cai, B. F.
    Mao, X. Q.
    Wang, J. N.
    Wang, M. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 33 (02) : 82 - 95
  • [9] A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation
    Cai, Yiyong
    Newth, David
    Finnigan, John
    Gunasekera, Don
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 148 : 381 - 395
  • [10] The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland
    Callan, Tim
    Lyons, Sean
    Scott, Susan
    Tol, Richard S. J.
    Verde, Stefano
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (02) : 407 - 412