Recommendations for the Involvement of Patient Research Partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A Report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP

被引:45
作者
Cheung, Peter P. [1 ]
de Wit, Maarten [2 ]
Bingham, Clifton O., III [3 ]
Kirwan, John R. [4 ]
Leong, Amye [5 ]
March, Lyn M. [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Montie, Pam [10 ]
Scholte-Voshaar, Marieke [11 ]
Gossec, Laure [12 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Div Rheumatol, 1E Kent Ridge Rd,NUHS Tower Block,Level 10, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Med Humanities, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Div Rheumatol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Bristol, Acad Rheumatol Unit, Bristol Royal Infirm, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Hlth Motivat Bone & Joint Decade, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[6] Univ Sydney, Inst Bone & Joint Res, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[9] Royal N Shore Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
[10] Arthrit Res Ctr Canada, Arthrit Patient Advisory Board, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[11] Univ Twente, Dept Psychol Hlth & Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[12] Univ Paris 06, Sorbonne Univ, Pitie Salpetriere Hosp, AP HP,Inst Pierre Louis Epidemiol & Sante Publ,De, Paris, France
关键词
PATIENT INVOLVEMENT; OMERACT; PATIENT RESEARCH PARTNERS; RECOMMENDATIONS; RHEUMATOLOGY RESEARCH; USER INVOLVEMENT; PRINCIPLES; BENEFITS; QUALITY; FILTER;
D O I
10.3899/jrheum.141011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. Patient participation in research is increasing; however, practical guidelines to enhance this participation are lacking. Specifically within the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) organization, although patients have participated in OMERACT meetings since 2002, consensus about the procedures for involving patients in working groups has not been formalized. The objective is to develop a set of recommendations regarding patient research partner (PRP) involvement in research working groups. Methods. We conducted a systematic literature review on recommendations/guidelines of PRP involvement in research; elaborated a structured consensus process involving multiple participants to develop a set of recommendations; and sought endorsement of recommendations by OMERACT. Results. In the 18 articles included in the literature review, there was general agreement on the broad concepts for recommendations covering PRP involvement in research although they were heterogeneous in detail. Most considered PRP involvement in all phases of research with early engagement, training, and support important, but details on the content were scarce. This review informed a larger consensus-building process regarding PRP inclusion in OMERACT research. Three overarching principles and 8 recommendations were developed, discussed, and refined at OMERACT 2014. The guiding principles were endorsed during the OMERACT plenary session. Conclusion. These recommendations for PRP involvement in OMERACT research reinforce the importance of patient participation throughout the research process as integral members. Although the applicability of the recommendations in other research contexts should be assessed, the generalizability is expected to be high. Future research should evaluate their implementation and their effect on outcome development.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 192
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Patients as Partners in Responsive Research: Methodological Notions for Collaborations in Mixed Research Teams [J].
Abma, Tineke A. ;
Nierse, Christi J. ;
Widdershoven, Guy A. M. .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (03) :401-415
[2]   Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer Review [J].
Ahmed, Syed M. ;
Palermo, Ann-Gel S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (08) :1380-1387
[3]   Participatory Action Research With Older Adults: Key Principles in Practice [J].
Blair, Thomas ;
Minkler, Meredith .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 49 (05) :651-662
[4]  
Boers Maarten., 2015, The OMERACT Handbook
[5]   Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: Results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis [J].
Boote, J ;
Barber, R ;
Cooper, C .
HEALTH POLICY, 2006, 75 (03) :280-297
[6]   Consumers as researchers - innovative experiences in UK National Health Service Research [J].
Caldon, Lisa J. M. ;
Marshall-Cork, Hazel ;
Speed, Gillian ;
Reed, Malcolm W. R. ;
Collins, Karen A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2010, 34 (05) :547-550
[7]   European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects [J].
de Wit, M. P. T. ;
Berlo, S. E. ;
Aanerud, G. J. ;
Aletaha, D. ;
Bijlsma, J. W. ;
Croucher, L. ;
Da Silva, J. A. P. ;
Gluesing, B. ;
Gossec, L. ;
Hewlett, S. ;
Jongkees, M. ;
Magnusson, D. ;
Scholte-Voshaar, M. ;
Richards, P. ;
Ziegler, C. ;
Abma, T. A. .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2011, 70 (05) :722-726
[8]   Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences [J].
de Wit, Maarten ;
Abma, Tineke ;
Koelewijn-van Loon, Marije ;
Collins, Sarah ;
Kirwan, John .
BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (05)
[9]   Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences-lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study [J].
de Wit, Maarten ;
Abma, Tineke ;
Koelewijn-Van Loon, Marije ;
Collins, Sarah ;
Kirwan, John .
BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (08)
[10]  
de Wit MP, 2013, HLTH EXPECT