Multivariate pattern analysis for MEG: A comparison of dissimilarity measures

被引:87
|
作者
Guggenmos, Matthias [1 ]
Sterzer, Philipp [1 ]
Cichy, Radoslaw Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Visual Percept Lab, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Educ & Psychol, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
MEG; EEG; Multi-voxel pattern analysis; Decoding; Representational similarity analysis; Cross-validation; Noise normalisation; Machine learning; OBJECT RECOGNITION; CORTICAL DYNAMICS; TEMPORAL CORTEX; REPRESENTATIONS; SPACE; SIMILARITY; INTERFERENCE; POPULATION; MONKEY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.044
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) methods such as decoding and representational similarity analysis (RSA) are growing rapidly in popularity for the analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. However, little is known about the relative performance and characteristics of the specific dissimilarity measures used to describe differences between evoked activation patterns. Here we used a multisession MEG data set to qualitatively characterize a range of dissimilarity measures and to quantitatively compare them with respect to decoding accuracy (for decoding) and between-session reliability of representational dissimilarity matrices (for RSA). We tested dissimilarity measures from a range of classifiers (Linear Discriminant Analysis - LDA, Support Vector Machine - SVM, Weighted Robust Distance - WeiRD, Gaussian Naive Bayes - GNB) and distances (Euclidean distance, Pearson correlation). In addition, we evaluated three key processing choices: 1) preprocessing (noise normalisation, removal of the pattern mean), 2) weighting decoding accuracies by decision values, and 3) computing distances in three different partitioning schemes (non-cross-validated, cross-validated, within-class-corrected). Four main conclusions emerged from our results. First, appropriate multivariate noise normalization substantially improved decoding accuracies and the reliability of dissimilarity measures. Second, LDA, SVM and WeiRD yielded high peak decoding accuracies and nearly identical time courses. Third, while using decoding accuracies for RSA was markedly less reliable than continuous distances, this disadvantage was ameliorated by decision-value-weighting of decoding accuracies. Fourth, the cross- validated Euclidean distance provided unbiased distance estimates and highly replicable representational dissimilarity matrices. Overall, we strongly advise the use of multivariate noise normalisation as a general preprocessing step, recommend LDA, SVM and WeiRD as classifiers for decoding and highlight the cross- validated Euclidean distance as a reliable and unbiased default choice for RSA.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multivariate pattern analysis for MEG: A comparison of dissimilarity measures (vol 173, pg 434, 2018)
    Guggenmos, Matthias
    Sterzer, Philipp
    Cichy, Radoslaw Martin
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 181 : 845 - 845
  • [2] Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: A comparison of representational structure in time and space
    Cichy, Radoslaw Martin
    Pantazis, Dimitrios
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 158 : 441 - 454
  • [3] Measures of precision for dissimilarity-based multivariate analysis of ecological communities
    Anderson, Marti J.
    Santana-Garcon, Julia
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 18 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [4] Reliability of dissimilarity measures for multi-voxel pattern analysis
    Walther, Alexander
    Nili, Hamed
    Ejaz, Naveed
    Alink, Arjen
    Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
    Diedrichsen, Jorn
    NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 137 : 188 - 200
  • [5] Dissimilarity measures for visual pattern partitioning
    Dosil, R
    Fdez-Vidal, XR
    Pardo, XM
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, PT 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3523 : 287 - 294
  • [6] Testing for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions Using Dissimilarity Measures
    Gijbels, Irene
    Omelka, Marek
    BIOMETRICS, 2013, 69 (01) : 137 - 145
  • [7] Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures for Comparison of Propagation Patterns
    Rickard, H. Erin
    Saeger, J. T.
    Hackett, Erin E.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION & USNC/URSI NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE MEETING, 2015, : 1118 - 1119
  • [8] Dynamic pattern decoding of source-reconstructed MEG or EEG data: Perspective of multivariate pattern analysis and signal leakage
    Gohel, Bakul
    Lim, Sanghyun
    Kim, Min-Young
    Kwon, Hyukchan
    Kim, Kiwoong
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 93 : 106 - 116
  • [9] An Empirical Comparison of Dissimilarity Measures for Time Series Classification
    Giusti, Rafael
    Batista, Gustavo E. A. P. A.
    2013 BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS), 2013, : 82 - 88
  • [10] Comparison of multiple measures of ADHD symptomatology: A multivariate genetic analysis
    Nadder, TS
    Silberg, JL
    Rutter, M
    Maes, HH
    Eaves, LJ
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (04) : 475 - 486