Sensitivity and specificity of a visual acuity screening protocol performed with the Lea Symbols 15-line folding distance chart in preschool children

被引:27
作者
Bertuzzi, Francesca
Orsoni, Jelka Gabriella
Porta, Maria Rita
Paliaga, Gian Paolo
Miglior, Stefano
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Policlin Monza Hosp, Ophthalmol Clin, Milan, Italy
[2] Strabismus Ctr, Como, Italy
[3] Univ Parma, Inst Ophthalmol, I-43100 Parma, Italy
来源
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2006年 / 84卷 / 06期
关键词
visual acuity deficiency; preschool screening; diagnostic validity; pre-literate charts;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00668.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a visual acuity (VA) test using the Lea Symbols 15-line folding distance chart and its diagnostic validity in detecting VA deficiency in preschool children. Methods: A group of 149 children aged 38-54 months underwent VA examination performed with the Lea 15-line folding optotype at a distance of 3 metres, according to a test protocol described in the Methods section. After the VA test, a complete ophthalmological examination, including cycloplegic retinoscopy, a cover test and examination of the anterior and posterior segments, was performed on each child in order to detect any VA-threatening ocular abnormality. The Lea Symbols test's sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR +, LR-) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated by means of standard procedures using each VA level of the chart from 0.1 to 1 (1-0 logMAR) as a cut-off point. Results: The Lea Symbols test could be successfully used in 95.9% of the population. The most useful cut-off points for screening preschool children were found to be 0.8 (LR + 5.73, LR - 0.05) or 0.63 (LR + 11.7, LR - 0.23). Conclusion: The Lea Symbols test proved to be clinically useful in detecting VA deficiency in preschool children. The choice between the two best performing cut-off levels should be made according to the expected cost-effectiveness of the screening programme.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 811
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Atkinson J, 1985, DOC OPHTHALMOL, V45, P201
[2]  
Becker R H, 2000, Strabismus, V8, P209
[3]  
Camparini M, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, P1226
[4]   Negative predictive value of a vision screening program aimed at children aged 3 to 4 years old [J].
Chui, L ;
Fraser, T ;
Hoar, K ;
LaRoche, GR .
JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2004, 8 (06) :566-570
[5]  
*CONS OPHTH U VIS, 1984, VIS AC MEAS STAND
[6]   The influence of stimulus size on measured visual field extent in infants [J].
Dobson, V ;
Baldwin, MB ;
Mohan, KM ;
Delaney, SM ;
Harvey, EM .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (10) :698-702
[7]  
FERN KD, 1986, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V63, P319
[8]   VISION TEST FOR CHILDREN - USE OF SYMBOLS [J].
FFOOKS, O .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1965, 49 (06) :312-&
[9]   Comparison of Lea single symbols and Landolt single optotypes [J].
Gräf, M ;
Becker, R .
KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1999, 215 (02) :86-90
[10]   Lea symbols:: visual acuity assessment and detection of amblyopia [J].
Gräf, MH ;
Becker, R ;
Kaufmann, H .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 238 (01) :53-58