The path to sustainable energy supply systems: Proposal of an integrative sustainability assessment framework

被引:27
作者
Buchmayr, A. [1 ,2 ]
Verhofstadt, E. [2 ]
Van Ootegem, L. [2 ]
Delmas, D. Sanjuan [1 ]
Thomassen, G. [1 ,3 ]
Dewulf, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Res Grp Sustainable Syst Engn STEN, Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Econ, St Pieterspl 6, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Dept Engn Management, Prinsstr 13, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Sustainability assessment; Life cycle assessment; Local impact assessment; Risk assessment; Energy supply; Energy technology; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; NATURAL-ENVIRONMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOCIAL IMPACTS; ASSESSMENT LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110666
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy supply is essential for the functioning and well-being of a society. Decision-makers are faced with the challenge to balance burdens and benefits of energy supply practices with the aim to achieve environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Literature exhibits a broad variety of sustainability assessment frameworks for energy supply technologies. However, there is no consensus on which aspects need to be covered for a comprehensive assessment of sustainability. While some aspects, such as environmental emission damage, receive predominant attention, there is a lack of coverage and adequate quantification for others. This led in the past to an unbalanced basis for decision-making. Based on an analysis of literature, 12 impact categories were identified for the assessment of energy technologies. The analysis included the judgement of quantification approaches regarding their significance for describing the impact categories and their maturity resulting in the proposal of 12 concrete indicators. A framework is proposed to manage and integrate the assessment of single impact categories. The framework produces normalized and weighted output indicators to use in the form of a dashboard or alternatively a single sustainability index for informed decision-making. Finally, the proposed sustainability assessment framework relies on life cycle, local impact, and supply chain risks assessment. It consists of both well-established assessment methods as well as suggestions for new indicators in order to allow a full assessment of all impact categories. It thereby goes beyond the isolated assessment of impacts and offers the basis for comparison of complete energy supply mixes.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]   Assessment of nuclear energy sustainability index using fuzzy logic [J].
Abouelnaga, Ayah E. ;
Metwally, Abdelmohsen ;
Aly, Naguib ;
Nagy, Mohammad ;
Agamy, Saeed .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2010, 240 (07) :1928-1933
[2]   Sustainability assessment of energy systems: A novel integrated model [J].
Abu-Rayash, Azzam ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 :1098-1116
[3]   Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Pakistan: Policy regime for a sustainable energy mix [J].
Akber, Muhammad Zeshan ;
Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin ;
Arshad, Husnain .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 111 :111-126
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 24571 EUR EN JOINT R
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment - Making informed choices on products
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Projected costs of generating electricity
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Renewable Energy and Jobs: Annual Review 2019, P40
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Methodological sheets for subcategories in social life cycle assessment
[10]   Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs [J].
Arvesen, Anders ;
Hertwich, Edgar G. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (08) :5994-6006