Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments

被引:39
作者
Fu, Weihua [1 ]
Yang, Yong [1 ]
Li, Xiang [1 ]
Heron, Dwight E. [1 ]
Huq, M. Saiful [1 ]
Yue, Ning J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/20/016
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work is to determine dose delivery errors that could result from systematic rotational setup errors (Delta Phi) for prostate cancer patients treated with three-phase sequential boost IMRT. In order to implement this, different rotational setup errors around three Cartesian axes were simulated for five prostate patients and dosimetric indices, such as dose volume histogram (DVH), tumour control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD), were employed to evaluate the corresponding dosimetric influences. Rotational setup errors were simulated by adjusting the gantry, collimator and horizontal couch angles of treatment beams and the dosimetric effects were evaluated by recomputing the dose distributions in the treatment planning system. Our results indicated that, for prostate cancer treatment with the three-phase sequential boost IMRT technique, the rotational setup errors do not have significant dosimetric impacts on the cumulative plan. Even in the worst-case scenario with Delta Phi = 3 degrees, the prostate EUD varied within 1.5% and TCP decreased about 1%. For seminal vesicle, slightly larger influences were observed. However, EUD and TCP changes were still within 2%. The influence on sensitive structures, such as rectum and bladder, is also negligible. This study demonstrates that the rotational setup error degrades the dosimetric coverage of target volume in prostate cancer treatment to a certain degree. However, the degradation was not significant for the three-phase sequential boost prostate IMRT technique and for the margin sizes used in our institution.
引用
收藏
页码:5321 / 5331
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Prediction of the benefits from dose-escalated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Amer, AM ;
Mott, J ;
Mackay, RI ;
Williams, PC ;
Livsey, J ;
Logue, JP ;
Hendry, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (01) :199-207
[2]  
[Anonymous], RAD RES S
[3]   Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT [J].
Astreinidou, E ;
Bel, A ;
Raaijmakers, CPJ ;
Terhaard, CHJ ;
Lagendijk, JJW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :938-944
[4]  
Balter J. M., 2001, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V51, P94, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01997-6
[5]   Adapting inverse planning to patient and organ geometrical variation:: algorithm and implementation [J].
Birkner, M ;
Yan, D ;
Alber, M ;
Liang, J ;
Nüsslin, F .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (10) :2822-2831
[6]  
Bos LJ, 2003, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V68, pS69
[7]   The sensitivity of dose distributions for organ motion and set-up uncertainties in prostate IMRT [J].
Bos, LJ ;
van der Geer, J ;
van Herk, M ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
Lebesque, JV ;
Damen, EMF .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 (01) :18-26
[8]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[9]   THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A GENERALIZED BATHO INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTION FOR RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING WITH DIRECT USE OF CT NUMBERS [J].
CASSELL, KJ ;
HOBDAY, PA ;
PARKER, RP .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1981, 26 (05) :825-833
[10]  
Crimaldi AJ, 2004, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V60, pS334