What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness

被引:197
作者
Gefen, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
enterprise resource planning; ERP; ERP implementation; technology acceptance model; trust; trust antecedents;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2004.11045792
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
To a large extent, trust determines expected utility derived from business transactions where the trusting party is dependent upon others, but lacks control over them. In many instances, this typifies the relationship between clients and an enterprise resource planning (ERP) customization vendor. This exploratory study examines how trust is built during an ERP implementation, and the relative weight of this trust compared with the perceived qualities of the implemented ERP itself in determining clients' assessment that the business relationship with the vendor is worthwhile. The data, collected from companies that were involved in the process of implementing a new ERP with the on-site assistance of a certain customization vendor, show that all three trust antecedents suggested by Zucker's seminal study of trust-process-based, characteristic-based, and institution-based mechanisms-contribute significantly to client trust. The data also show that client trust in this customization vendor and the perceived usefulness of the ERP both contribute to client assessment that their business relationship with the vendor is worthwhile, showing that both getting the job done and creating a trust-based relationship contribute to this assessment. The implications of the importance of creating trust in ERP implementation and the means of doing how to do so are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 288
页数:26
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   EVOLUTION OF THE MARKETING ORGANIZATION - NEW FORMS FOR TURBULENT ENVIRONMENTS [J].
ACHROL, RS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1991, 55 (04) :77-93
[2]   A MODEL OF THE DISTRIBUTORS PERSPECTIVE OF DISTRIBUTOR-MANUFACTURER WORKING RELATIONSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1984, 48 (04) :62-74
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Elementary survey sampling
[4]  
AUGUSTWILHELM S, 2000, COMMUN ACM, V43, P57
[5]  
Barclay D.W., 1995, TECHNOL STUDIES, V2, P285, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[6]  
Blau PM., 1964, Exchange and power in social life
[7]   CONFLICT, COOPERATION AND TRUST IN 3 POWER-SYSTEMS [J].
BONOMA, TV .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1976, 21 (06) :499-514
[8]   A BEHAVIORAL DECISION-THEORY APPROACH TO MODELING DYADIC TRUST IN SUPERIORS AND SUBORDINATES [J].
BUTLER, JK ;
CANTRELL, RS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1984, 55 (01) :19-28
[9]  
Carr NG, 2003, HARVARD BUS REV, V81, P41
[10]  
Chin WW, 1998, MIS QUART, V22, pVII