Effects of computer monitor setting on muscular activity, user comfort and acceptability in office work

被引:15
作者
Kothiyal, Kamal [1 ]
Bjornerem, Ane Marte [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Safety Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION | 2009年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Electromyography; office work; seated posture; user comfort; computer monitor position; POSTURE; HEIGHT; ANGLE; NECK; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ANTHROPOMETRICS; DISCOMFORT; PLACEMENT; MUSCLE; SIGHT;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-2009-0801
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a study to investigate the effect of computer monitor height on the neck muscle activity, user comfort and user acceptability for office based tasks in the seated posture. Ten subjects with intermediate level of computer-skill participated in the study. Three computer monitor height settings-high, medium and low representing respectively angles of sight of 15 degrees, 30 degrees and 45 degrees below the horizontal at eye level were considered. Electromyography recordings from the right and left upper trapezius muscles were obtained for each monitor placement. The ratings of user comfort and acceptability were also obtained for each of the monitor settings. Statistical analysis of muscular activity data showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the mean RMS values for the three monitor settings. Results of the study indicate that the overall comfort was significantly more for high monitor setting than for the medium and low settings. It was also found that the comfort ratings for the neck and the low back regions were significantly higher for the high monitor setting compared to the low setting. Data analysis of user acceptability ratings for different monitor positions showed that the high monitor setting was significantly more acceptable than the medium and the low settings.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 163
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain?: Results of a prospective cohort study [J].
Ariëns, GAM ;
Bongers, PM ;
Douwes, M ;
Miedema, MC ;
Hoogendoorn, WE ;
van der Wal, G ;
Bouter, LM ;
van Mechelen, W .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 58 (03) :200-207
[2]   MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS AMONG VISUAL-DISPLAY TERMINAL WORKERS - INDIVIDUAL, ERGONOMIC, AND WORK ORGANIZATIONAL-FACTORS [J].
BERGQVIST, U ;
WOLGAST, E ;
NILSSON, B ;
VOSS, M .
ERGONOMICS, 1995, 38 (04) :763-776
[3]   The influence of different sitting positions on cervical and lumbar posture [J].
Black, KM ;
McClure, P ;
Polansky, M .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (01) :65-70
[4]   The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle [J].
Burgess-Limerick, R ;
Plooy, A ;
Ankrum, DR .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (08) :584-592
[5]   The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics [J].
De Luca, CJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 13 (02) :135-163
[6]  
DEMATTEO R, 1993, WORK DISPLAY UNITS, V92
[7]   Work with visual display units:: Long-term health effects of high and downward line-of-sight in ordinary office environments [J].
Fostervold, KI ;
Aarås, A ;
Lie, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2006, 36 (04) :331-343
[8]   VDT WORKSTATION DESIGN - PREFERRED SETTINGS AND THEIR EFFECTS [J].
GRANDJEAN, E ;
HUNTING, W ;
PIDERMANN, M .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1983, 25 (02) :161-175
[9]   DISCOMFORT AND LOAD ON THE UPPER TRAPEZIUS MUSCLE WHEN OPERATING A WORDPROCESSOR [J].
HAGBERG, M ;
SUNDELIN, G .
ERGONOMICS, 1986, 29 (12) :1637-1645
[10]   POSTURAL AND VISUAL LOADS AT VDT WORKPLACES .1. CONSTRAINED POSTURES [J].
HUNTING, W ;
LAUBLI, T ;
GRANDJEAN, E .
ERGONOMICS, 1981, 24 (12) :917-931