Transcriptome analysis of sugar beet root maggot (Tetanops myopaeformis) genes modulated by the Beta vulgaris host

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Haiyan [1 ]
Smigocki, Ann C. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Mol Plant Pathol Lab, 10300 Baltimore Ave, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
Beta vulgaris; resistant; sugar beet root maggot; suppressive subtractive hybridization; susceptible; transcriptome; IMMUNE-RELATED GENES; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; EXPRESSION; INSECT; IDENTIFICATION; DIPTERA; RESISTANCE; RESPONSES; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1111/1744-7917.12409
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Sugar beet root maggot (SBRM, Tetanops myopaeformis von Roder) is a major but poorly understood insect pest of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). The molecular mechanisms underlying plant defense responses are well documented, however, little information is available about complementary mechanisms for insect adaptive responses to overcome host resistance. To date, no studies have been published on SBRM gene expression profiling. Suppressive subtractive hybridization (SSH) generated more than 300 SBRM ESTs differentially expressed in the interaction of the pest with a moderately resistant (F1016) and a susceptible (F1010) sugar beet line. Blast2GO v. 3.2 search indicated that over 40% of the differentially expressed genes had known functions, primarily driven by fruit fly D. melanogaster genes. Expression patterns of 18 selected EST clones were confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis predicted a dominance of metabolic and catalytic genes involved in the interaction of SBRM with its host. SBRM genes functioning during development, regulation, cellular process, signaling and under stress conditions were annotated. SBRM genes that were common or unique in response to resistant or susceptible interactions with the host were identified and their possible roles in insect responses to the host are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 234
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimizing a pheromone lure for the sugar beet root maggot fly,Tetanops myopaeformis
    Wenninger, Erik J.
    Eigenbrode, Sanford D.
    ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 2020, 168 (09) : 654 - 664
  • [2] BACTERIAL SYMBIONTS IN THE SUGAR-BEET ROOT MAGGOT, TETANOPS-MYOPAEFORMIS (VONRODER)
    IVERSON, KL
    BROMEL, MC
    ANDERSON, AW
    FREEMAN, TP
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 47 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [3] The annotation of genomic dataset sequences of the sugar beet root maggot Tetanops myopaeformis , TmSBRM_v1.0
    Acharya, Sudha
    Alkharouf, Nadim W.
    Chu, Chenggen
    Klink, Vincent P.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2024, 55
  • [4] HOST PLANTS OF THE SUGARBEET ROOT MAGGOT, TETANOPS-MYOPAEFORMIS (DIPTERA, OTITIDAE)
    MAHRT, GG
    BLICKENSTAFF, CC
    ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1979, 72 (05) : 627 - 631
  • [5] A de novo assembly of genomic dataset sequences of the sugar beet root maggot Tetanops myopaeformis , TmSBRM_v1.0
    Alkharouf, Nadim W.
    Chu, Chenggen
    Klink, Vincent P.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2024, 54
  • [6] Transcriptome analysis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in response to alkaline stress
    Zou, Chunlei
    Liu, Dan
    Wu, Peiran
    Wang, Yubo
    Gai, Zhijia
    Liu, Lei
    Yang, Fangfang
    Li, Caifeng
    Guo, Guanghao
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2020, 102 (06) : 645 - 657
  • [7] Transcriptome analysis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in response to alkaline stress
    Chunlei Zou
    Dan Liu
    Peiran Wu
    Yubo Wang
    Zhijia Gai
    Lei Liu
    Fangfang Yang
    Caifeng Li
    Guanghao Guo
    Plant Molecular Biology, 2020, 102 : 645 - 657
  • [8] A Colletotrichum sp. causing root rot in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)
    Hanson, L. E.
    Neher, O. T.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 105 (11) : 56 - 57
  • [9] Response of root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) to salt stress
    Dadkhah, A.
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 150 (03): : S196 - S196
  • [10] PARAMETERS OF FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEM OF SUGAR BEET (BETA-VULGARIS L
    FICK, GW
    WILLIAMS, WA
    ULRICH, A
    CROP SCIENCE, 1972, 12 (01) : 108 - &