Lessons for climate policy from behavioral biases towards COVID-19 and climate change risks

被引:68
作者
Botzen, Wouter [1 ,2 ]
Duijndam, Sem [1 ]
van Beukering, Pieter [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ, Inst Environm Studies, Boelelaan 1085, NL-1181 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Sch Econ USE, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Behavioral biases; Climate policy; COVID-19; Decision making under risk; Risk perception; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105214
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
COVID-19 and climate change share several striking similarities in terms of causes and consequences. For instance, COVID-19 and climate change affect deprived and vulnerable communities the most, which implies that effectively designed policies that mitigate these risks may also reduce the widening inequal-ities that they cause. Both problems can be characterized as low-probability-high consequence (LP-HC) risks, which are associated with various behavioral biases that imply that individual behavior deviates from rational risk assessments by experts and optimal preparedness strategies. One could view the COVID-19 pandemic as a rapid learning experiment about how to cope more effectively with climate change and develop actions for reducing its impacts before it is too late. However, the ensuing question relates to whether the COVID-19 crisis and its aftermath will speed up climate change mitigation and adaptation policies, which depends on how individuals perceive and take action to reduce LP-HC risks. Using insights into behavioral biases in individual decisions about LP-HC risks based on decades of empirical research in psychology and behavioral economics, we illustrate how parallels can be drawn between decision-making processes about COVID-19 and climate change. In particular, we discuss six important risk-related behavioral biases in the context of individual decision making about these two global challenges to derive lessons for climate policy. We contend that the impacts from climate change can be mitigated if we proactively draw lessons from the pandemic, and implement policies that work with, instead of against, an individual's risk perceptions and biases. We conclude with recommendations for communication policies that make people pay attention to climate change risks and for linking government responses to the COVID-19 crisis and its aftermath with environmental sustainability and climate action. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Blais A., 2020, 20201 QPE
  • [2] Botzen WJW, 2015, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V10, P365
  • [3] Bradt Jacob., 2019, Behavioural Public Policy, P1
  • [4] A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior
    Bubeck, P.
    Botzen, W. J. W.
    Aerts, J. C. J. H.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2012, 32 (09) : 1481 - 1495
  • [5] International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century
    Capstick, Stuart
    Whitmarsh, Lorraine
    Poortinga, Wouter
    Pidgeon, Nick
    Upham, Paul
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 6 (01) : 35 - 61
  • [6] Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response
    Douglas, Margaret
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Taulbut, Martin
    Mckee, Martin
    McCartney, Gerry
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 369
  • [7] Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
  • [8] Temporal Discounting of Tornado Shelter-Seeking Intentions Amidst Standard and Impact-Based Weather Alerts: A Crowdsourced Experiment
    Gelino, Brett W.
    Reed, Derek D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2020, 26 (01) : 16 - 25
  • [9] Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: Policy Insights from Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence
    Gillingham, Kenneth
    Palmer, Karen
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2014, 8 (01) : 18 - 38
  • [10] An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods
    Gneezy, U
    Potters, J
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) : 631 - 645