Endoscopic TriModal imaging and biomarkers for neoplasia conjoined: a feasibility study in Barrett's esophagus

被引:10
|
作者
Boerwinkel, D. F. [1 ]
Di Pietro, M. [3 ]
Liu, X. [3 ]
Shariff, M. K. [3 ]
Lao-Sirieix, P. [3 ]
Walker, C. E. [3 ]
Visser, M. [2 ]
Donovan, M. O' [4 ]
Kaye, P. [5 ]
Bergman, J. J. G. H. M. [1 ]
Fitzgerald, R. C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Hutchison MRC Res Ctr, MRC Canc Cell Unit, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, England
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Pathol, Cambridge, England
[5] Queens Med Ctr, Dept Cellular Pathol, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
autofluorescence imaging; Barrett's esophagus; biomarker; neoplasia; LOW-GRADE DYSPLASIA; VIENNA CLASSIFICATION; PROGRESSION; RISK; AUTOFLUORESCENCE; ADENOCARCINOMA; HYPERMETHYLATION; PATTERNS; P16;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01428.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
In Barrett's esophagus (BE), the normal squamous lining of the esophagus is replaced by specialized columnar epithelium. Endoscopic surveillance with autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and molecular biomarkers have been studied separately to detect early neoplasia (EN) in BE. The combination of advanced-imaging modalities and biomarkers has not been investigated; AFI may help detecting biomarkers as a risk-stratification tool. We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of patients undergoing endoscopy for EN in BE with AFI and correlated five biomarkers (HPP1, RUNX3, p16, cyclin A, and p53) in tissue samples with AFI and dysplasia status. Fifty-eight samples from a previous prospective study were selected: 15 true-positive (TP: AFI-positive, EN), 21 false-positive (FP: AFI-positive, no EN), 12 true-negative (TN1; AFI-negative, no EN in sample), 10 true-negative (TN2: AFI-negative, no EN in esophagus). Methylation-specific RT-PCR was performed for HPP1, RUNX3, p16, and immunohistochemistry for cyclin A, p53. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons. P16, cyclin A, p53 correlated with dysplasia (P < 0.01, P = 0.003, P < 0.001, respectively). Increased p16 methylation was observed between TP versus TN2 (P = 0.003) and TN1 versus TN2 (P = 0.04) subgroups, suggesting a field defect. Only p53 correlated with AFI-status (P = 0.003). After exclusion of EN samples, significance was lost. Although correlation with dysplasia status was confirmed for p16, cyclin A and p53, underlining the importance of these biomarkers as an early event in neoplastic progression, none of the investigated biomarkers correlated with AFI status. A larger prospective study is needed to assess the combination of AFI and a larger panel of biomarkers to improve risk stratification in BE.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 443
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minichromosomal Maintenance Component Complex 5 (MCM5) as a Marker of Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia: A Feasibility Study
    Everson, M.
    Magee, C.
    Alzoubaidi, D.
    Brogden, S.
    Graham, D.
    Lovat, L. B.
    Novelli, M.
    Haidry, R.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (10) : 2815 - 2822
  • [32] Imaging for Barrett's esophagus: state of the art
    Sutton, Richard A.
    Sharma, Prateek
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 35 (05) : 395 - 400
  • [33] Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus
    Moinova, Helen R.
    LaFramboise, Thomas
    Lutterbaugh, James D.
    Chandar, Apoorva Krishna
    Dumot, John
    Faulx, Ashley
    Brock, Wendy
    Cabrera, Omar De la Cruz
    Guda, Kishore
    Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
    Iyer, Prasad G.
    Canto, Marcia I.
    Wang, Jean S.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    Thota, Prashanti N.
    Willis, Joseph E.
    Chak, Amitabh
    Markowitz, Sanford D.
    SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 10 (424)
  • [34] Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett's Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia
    Yang, Dennis
    Othman, Mohamed
    Draganov, Peter V.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 17 (06) : 1019 - 1028
  • [35] Impact of advanced endoscopic imaging on Barrett's esophagus in daily clinical practice
    Beg, Sabina
    Mensa, Mussa
    Fullard, Mark
    Finerty, Elizabeth
    Richman, Paul
    Leahy, Anthony
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (05) : 1189 - 1194
  • [36] Advanced Endoscopic Imaging for Barrett’s Esophagus: Current Options and Future Directions
    Michelle H. Lee
    Kristin Buterbaugh
    Rebecca Richards-Kortum
    Sharmila Anandasabapathy
    Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2012, 14 (3) : 216 - 225
  • [37] Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic treatments II
    Greenwald, Bruce D.
    Lightdale, Charles J.
    Abrams, Julian A.
    Horwhat, John D.
    Chuttani, Ram
    Komanduri, Srinadh
    Upton, Melissa P.
    Appelman, Henry D.
    Shields, Helen M.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    Sontag, Stephen J.
    BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS: THE 10TH OESO WORLD CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 1232 : 156 - 174
  • [38] State of the art in the endoscopic imaging and ablation of Barrett's esophagus
    Panossian, Abraham M.
    Raimondo, Massimo
    Wolfsen, Herbert C.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 (05) : 365 - 373
  • [39] Combining endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection to treat neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus
    Holmes, Ian
    Hing, Tressia
    Friedland, Shai
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (12): : 5330 - 5337
  • [40] Endoscopic Treatment for Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus
    Kestens, Christine
    Siersema, Peter D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 39 (03) : 606 - 607