The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture

被引:95
作者
Myint, M. S.
Johnson, Y. J.
Tablante, N. L.
Heckert, R. A.
机构
[1] Virginia Maryland Reg Coll Vet Med, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
PCR; Salmonella; poultry products;
D O I
10.1016/j.fm.2005.09.002
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Salmonella spp. are the leading cause of foodborne illness worldwide. Conventional culture techniques for the detection of Salmonella spp. are labor intensive and time consuming. Several rapid detection methods have been developed over the past few years. However, standard methods for sample handling and preparation have not been established and limited data are available on the sensitivity and specificity of these methods for detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated retail meat. Using culture as the gold standard for Salmonella detection in naturally contaminated raw poultry products, the sensitivity and specificity of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection method was determined under varying enrichment protocols. Chicken meat samples (ground, boneless/skinless breast meat, and bone-in breast meat with skin) from retail grocery stores were pre-enriched in buffered peptone water (BPW) and Salmonella specific primers ST 11 and ST 15 were used to amplify a 429 bp region of random fragment target specific to all Salmonella spp. There was a significant decrease (P-value < 0.001) in the sensitivity of the PCR test when BPW pre-enrichment alone (85%) was used compared to the sensitivity achieved after both BPW enrichment and selective enrichment with RV and TT-H (100%). PCR failed to detect any positive samples when no pre-enrichment was conducted. A minimum of 12 h pre-enrichment was required for detection of Salmonella by PCR at a limit of 100 colony forming unit (cfu)/1 ml of sample. No detectable amplification product was seen in those naturally contaminated meat samples testing negative by culture methods. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 604
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   SALMONELLA IDENTIFICATION BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION [J].
AABO, S ;
RASMUSSEN, OF ;
ROSSEN, L ;
SORENSEN, PD ;
OLSEN, JE .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 1993, 7 (03) :171-178
[2]   RESEARCH NOTE - DETECTION OF SALMONELLA IN MINCED MEAT BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION METHOD [J].
AABO, S ;
ANDERSEN, JK ;
OLSEN, JE .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 21 (03) :180-182
[3]  
ANDREWS WH, 2003, BACTERIOLOGICAL ANAL, pCH5
[4]   EFFECT OF VARIOUS MEDIA AND INCUBATION CONDITIONS ON RECOVERY OF INOCULATED SALMONELLA FROM POULTRY FEED [J].
COX, NA ;
BAILEY, JS ;
THOMSON, JE .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1982, 61 (07) :1314-1321
[5]  
DANIEL WW, 1995, BIOSTATISTICS FDN AN, P503
[6]   A COMPARISON OF STANDARD CULTURAL METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF FOODBORNE SALMONELLA [J].
DAOUST, JY ;
SEWELL, AM ;
WARBURTON, DW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 16 (01) :41-50
[7]  
DAOUST JY, 1992, C REPORT SALMONELLA, P9
[8]  
DOHOO I, 2003, SCREENING DIAGNOSTIC, P86
[9]  
Gomez Thomas M., 1997, World Health Statistics Quarterly, V50, P81
[10]   A polymerase chain reaction procedure for the detection of Salmonella spp. within 24 hours [J].
Gouws, PA ;
Visser, M ;
Brozel, VS .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1998, 61 (08) :1039-1042