An international survey of adherence to Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2016 regarding fluid resuscitation and vasopressors in the initial management of septic shock

被引:20
作者
Bitton, Eden [1 ,2 ]
Zimmerman, Shmuel [1 ,2 ]
Pontes Azevedo, Luciano Cesar [3 ]
Benhamou, Dan [4 ]
Cecconi, Maurizio [5 ,14 ]
De Waele, Jan J. [6 ]
Lipman, Jeffrey [7 ,15 ,16 ,17 ]
Martin-Loeches, Ignacio [8 ,9 ]
Pirracchio, Romain [10 ,11 ]
Scheeren, Thomas W. L. [12 ]
Leone, Marc [13 ]
Einav, Sharon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Intens Care Unit, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Emergency Med Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Paris Saclay, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, Hop Bicetre, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[5] Humanitas Univ Pieve Emanuele, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[6] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Ghent, Belgium
[7] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Intens Care Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] St James Hosp, Multidisciplinary Intens Care Res Org MICRO, Dept Clin Med, Dublin, Ireland
[9] Trinity Ctr Hlth Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[10] Univ Calif San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Perioperat Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[11] Univ Calif San Francisco, Trauma Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[12] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[13] Aix Marseille Univ, Hop Univ Marseille, Hosp Nord, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Marseille, France
[14] IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Milan, Italy
[15] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[16] Jamieson Trauma Inst, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[17] Univ Montpellier, Nimes Univ Hosp, Montpellier, France
关键词
Sepsis (MeSH); Norepinephrine (MeSH); Dopamine (MeSH); Vasopressor; Guidelines; Compliance; GOAL-DIRECTED RESUSCITATION; TRIAL; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.11.016
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Our survey aimed to evaluate adherence to Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Guidelines 2016 among intensive care practitioners and to identify issues that remain controversial or lack clarity. Methods: Members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) were surveyed using an anonymous web-based survey written by an international group of experts. The primary outcome measure was the rate of adherence to specific recommendations. Secondary outcomes were to describe areas of controversy and lack of data and to associate specific practices with clinician characteristics. Results: Overall 820 questionnaires were completed. The SCC recommendations 2016 most adhered to were the choice of norepinephrine as first-line vasoactive drug (96.5%), vasopressor prescription based on therapeutic goal rather than dose (83.4%), targeting a specific mean arterial blood pressure during vasopressor use (77.9%), monitoring of blood pressure invasively (62.8%) and adding vasopressin or epinephrine as a second vasoactive agent (83.4%). We identified an internal conflict with regards to parallel versus sequential administration of fluids and vasoactive drugs and regional differences in practice that may be related to drug availabilities. Conclusion: The use of vasopressors and fluid use in septic shock is largely compliant with current guidelines but several controversies should be addressed in future guideline iterations. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 154
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Vasopressors for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Avni, Tomer
    Lador, Adi
    Lev, Shaul
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    Grossman, Alon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [2] Increasing mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock:: Effects on oxygen variables and renal function
    Bourgoin, A
    Leone, M
    Delmas, A
    Garnier, F
    Albanèse, J
    Martin, C
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (04) : 780 - 786
  • [3] Carneiro António Henriques, 2017, Rev. bras. ter. intensiva, V29, P4, DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20170002
  • [4] Dopamine versus norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock: A meta-analysis
    De Backer, Daniel
    Aldecoa, Cesar
    Njimi, Hassane
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (03) : 725 - 730
  • [5] Dellinger RP, 2008, INTENS CARE MED, V34, P17, DOI [10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41, 10.1007/s00134-008-1040-9]
  • [6] Evans L, 2021, INTENS CARE MED, V47, P1181, DOI [10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337]
  • [8] Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment
    Guo, Yimeng
    Kopec, Jacek A.
    Cibere, Jolanda
    Li, Linda C.
    Goldsmith, Charles H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (08) : 1422 - 1426
  • [9] Early goal-directed resuscitation for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Jiang, Li-bing
    Zhang, Mao
    Jiang, Shou-yin
    Ma, Yue-feng
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 24
  • [10] Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: A randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions
    Kongsved, Sissel Marie
    Basnov, Maja
    Holm-Christensen, Kurt
    Hjollund, Niels Henrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (03) : e25