Turbulence Modeling of Cavitating Flows in Liquid Rocket Turbopumps

被引:20
|
作者
Mani, Karthik V. [1 ,2 ]
Cervone, Angelo [2 ]
Hickey, Jean-Pierre [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Spacecraft Dept, Bunsenstr 10, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Space Syst Engn, Kluyverweg 1, NL-2629 Delft, Netherlands
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Mech & Mech Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2017年 / 139卷 / 01期
关键词
REYNOLDS-STRESS MODEL; 2-PHASE FLOWS; SIMULATION; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1115/1.4034096
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
An accurate prediction of the performance characteristics of cavitating cryogenic turbo-pump inducers is essential for an increased reliance on numerical simulations in the early turbopump design stages of liquid rocket engines (LRE). This work focuses on the sensitivities related to the choice of turbulence models on the cavitation prediction in flow setups relevant to cryogenic turbopump inducers. To isolate the influence of the turbulence closure models for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, four canonical problems are abstracted and studied individually to separately consider cavitation occurring in flows with a bluff body pressure drop, adverse pressure gradient, blade passage contraction, and rotation. The choice of turbulence model plays a significant role in the prediction of the phase distribution in the flow. It was found that the sensitivity to the closure model depends on the choice of cavitation model itself; the barotropic equation of state (BES) cavitation models are far more sensitive to the turbulence closure than the transport-based models. The sensitivity of the turbulence model is also strongly dependent on the type of flow. For bounded cavitation flows (blade passage), stark variations in the cavitation topology are observed based on the selection of the turbulence model. For unbounded problems, the spread in the results due to the choice of turbulence models is similar to noncavitating, single-phase flow cases.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Slip boundary condition for lattice Boltzmann modeling of liquid flows
    Wang, Kai
    Chai, Zhenhua
    Hou, Guoxiang
    Chen, Wei
    Xu, Sheng
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2018, 161 : 60 - 73
  • [32] TURBULENCE MODELING OF SOLUTE TRANSPORT IN OPEN-CHANNEL FLOWS OVER SUBMERGED VEGETATION
    Kang, Hyeongsik
    Choi, SungUk
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 674 - 679
  • [33] Two-fluid turbulence modeling of swirling gas-particle flows - A review
    Zhou, Lixing
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 314 : 253 - 263
  • [34] Numerical investigation on a new local preconditioning method for solving the incompressible inviscid, non-cavitating and cavitating flows
    Esfahanian, Vahid
    Akbarzadeh, Pooria
    JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE-ENGINEERING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2011, 348 (07): : 1208 - 1230
  • [35] Transition to turbulence in shear flows
    Eckhardt, Bruno
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 504 : 121 - 129
  • [36] Experimental and numerical research on cavitating flows around axisymmetric bodies
    Wei Haipeng
    Fu Song
    Wu Qin
    Huang Biao
    Wang Guoyu
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 28 (11) : 4527 - 4537
  • [37] Numerical investigation of cavitating flow in liquid hydrogen
    Huang, Biao
    Wu, Qin
    Wang, Guoyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (04) : 1698 - 1709
  • [38] Hydrodynamic Modeling of Dense Gas-Particle Turbulence Flows Under Microgravity Space Environments
    Liu, Yang
    Li, Guohui
    Kallio, Sirpa
    MICROGRAVITY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 23 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [39] Rayleigh-Plesset-based Eulerian mixture model for cavitating flows
    Cianferra, M.
    Armenio, V.
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (04)
  • [40] A quantitative comparison of phase-averaged models for bubbly, cavitating flows
    Bryngelson, Spencer H.
    Schmidmayer, Kevin
    Colonius, Tim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2019, 115 : 137 - 143