Evaluation of a Mathematical Model Based on Lubanska Equation to Predict Particle Size for Close-Coupled Gas Atomization of 316L Stainless Steel

被引:0
作者
da Silva, Flavia Costa [1 ,2 ]
de Lima, Moyses Leite [2 ]
Colombo, Giovanna Fiocco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Engn Sao Carlos, Av Trabalhador Sao Carlense 400, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Inst Pesquisas Tecnol Sao Paulo, Lab Proc Met, Av Prof Almeida Prado 532, BR-05508901 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS | 2022年 / 25卷
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
close-coupled gas atomization; additive manufacturing; 316L powder; Lubanska; equation; process parameters; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; FLUID-DYNAMICS; MELT PULSATION; METAL POWDERS; LIQUID; FLOW; NOZZLES; SIMULATION; STAGE;
D O I
10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2021-0364
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Close-Coupled Gas Atomization (CCGA) is often used to produce spherical metal powders with a wider Particle Size Distribution (PSD) (10 - 500 mu m) compared to that required by the main Additive Manufacturing processes (10 - 105 mu m). This work presents an accuracy evaluation of a mathematical model based on the Lubanska equation to predict the d50 for CCGA. Atomization experiments of 316L steel were conducted to evaluate the tip diameter and atomization gas pressure effects on PSD and, the d50 experimental results were used as the reference to the mathematical model evaluation. The mathematical model accuracy could be improved by: (i) considering the backpressure phenomenon for the metal flow rate calculation, since it was an important inaccuracy source; (ii) reviewing the tip diameter effect, which had a lower impact on d50 than that predicted by the Lubanska equation. The atomization gas pressure was the most influential parameter on d50 and d90 and the increase of the gas pressure led to a significant reduction in PSD and, consequently, increased yield.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Characterisation of metal powders generated by a pressure-gas-atomiser [J].
Achelis, Lydia ;
Uhlenwinkel, Volker .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2008, 477 (1-2) :15-20
[2]  
Anderson I.E., 2017, METAL SPRAYS SPRAY D, P49, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-52689-8{_}3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52689-8{_}3]
[3]   Feedstock powder processing research needs for additive manufacturing development [J].
Anderson, Iver E. ;
White, Emma M. H. ;
Dehoff, Ryan .
CURRENT OPINION IN SOLID STATE & MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2018, 22 (01) :8-15
[4]   Review of gas atomisation and spray forming phenomenology [J].
Antipas, G. S. E. .
POWDER METALLURGY, 2013, 56 (04) :317-330
[5]   Experimental and numerical modeling of the gas atomization nozzle for gas flow behavior [J].
Aydin, Ozer ;
Unal, Rahmi .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2011, 42 (01) :37-43
[6]   PRESSURE BUILDUP AT THE METAL DELIVERY TUBE ORIFICE IN ULTRASONIC GAS ATOMIZATION [J].
BARAM, JC ;
VEISTINEN, MK ;
LAVERNIA, EJ ;
ABINANTE, M ;
GRANT, NJ .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1988, 23 (07) :2457-2463
[7]   Impact of process flow conditions on particle morphology in metal powder production via gas atomization [J].
Beckers, D. ;
Ellendt, N. ;
Fritsching, U. ;
Uhlenwinkel, V .
ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 31 (01) :300-311
[8]   A mathematical model for cooling and rapid solidification of molten metal droplets [J].
Bergmann, D ;
Fritsching, U ;
Bauckhage, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2000, 39 (01) :53-62
[9]  
Fritsching U., 2004, Spray simulation: modelling and numerical simulation of sprayforming metals
[10]  
Fritsching U, 2006, ULLMANNS ENCY IND CH, DOI [10.1002/14356007.b24_b02.pub2, DOI 10.1002/14356007.B24_B02.PUB2]