A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency

被引:53
|
作者
Sheahan, Peter J. [1 ]
Nelson-Wong, Erika J. [2 ]
Fischer, Steven L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, 28 Div St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Regis Univ, Rueckert Hartman Coll Hlth Profess, Sch Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
关键词
Construct validity; cross-cultural adaptation; internal consistency; oswestry disability index; test-retest reliability; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CHINESE VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-report-based outcome measure used to quantify the extent of disability related to low back pain (LBP), a substantial contributor to workplace absenteeism. The ODI tool has been adapted for use by patients in several non-English speaking nations. It is unclear, however, if these adapted versions of the ODI are as credible as the original ODI developed for English-speaking nations. The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to identify culturally adapted versions of the ODI and to report on the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of these ODIs. Following a pragmatic review process, data were extracted from each study with regard to these four outcomes. While most studies applied adaptation processes in accordance with best-practice guidelines, there were some deviations. However, all studies reported high-quality psychometric properties: group mean construct validity was 0.7340.094 (indicated via a correlation coefficient), test-retest reliability was 0.9370.032 (indicated via an intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency was 0.8760.047 (indicated via Cronbach's alpha). Researchers can be confident when using any of these culturally adapted ODIs, or when comparing and contrasting results between cultures where these versions were employed.Implications for RehabilitationLow back pain is the second leading cause of disability in the world, behind only cancer.The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has been developed as a self-report outcome measure of low back pain for administration to patients.An understanding of the various cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI is important for more concerted multi-national research efforts.This review examines 16 cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI and should inform the work of health care and rehabilitation professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:2367 / 2374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and feasibility of the German version of the evidence-based practice inventory
    Braun, Tobias
    Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
    Bahns, Carolin
    Happe, Lisa
    Kopkow, Christian
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [42] Cross-cultural adaptation, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the Thai version of the University of Washington Pain-Related Self-Efficacy Scale
    Khampanthip, Angkana
    Kanlayanaphotporn, Rotsalai
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Janwantanakul, Prawit
    PAIN REPORTS, 2019, 4 (06)
  • [43] Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and feasibility of the German version of the evidence-based practice inventory
    Tobias Braun
    Katja Ehrenbrusthoff
    Carolin Bahns
    Lisa Happe
    Christian Kopkow
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [44] Translation, Test-retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the German Version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale in People with Axial Spondyloarthritis
    Saba, Riana
    Bruderer-Hofstetter, Marina
    Rausch, Anne-Kathrin
    Niedermann, Karin
    PHYSIOSCIENCE, 2022, 18 (04) : 174 - 183
  • [45] PRIMARY ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF R. SCHWARZER'S SCALE "PROACTIVE ATTITUDES" IN A NON-CLINICAL SAMPLE: CHECKING INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY
    Bekhter, A. A.
    EKSPERIMENTALNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA, 2022, 15 (02): : 213 - 226
  • [46] Relatively short term test re-test reliability of Neck Disability Index by long term test re-retest reliability method of Oswestry Disability Index in healthy office workers
    Irmak, Rafet
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2019, 64 (03): : 635 - 640
  • [47] Impact of Alzheimer’s Disease on Caregiver Questionnaire: internal consistency, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability of a new measure for assessing caregiver burden
    Jason C Cole
    Diane Ito
    Yaozhu J Chen
    Rebecca Cheng
    Jennifer Bolognese
    Josephine Li-McLeod
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12
  • [48] Impact of Alzheimer's Disease on Caregiver Questionnaire: internal consistency, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability of a new measure for assessing caregiver burden
    Cole, Jason C.
    Ito, Diane
    Chen, Yaozhu J.
    Cheng, Rebecca
    Bolognese, Jennifer
    Li-McLeod, Josephine
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12
  • [49] Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the revised Upper Extremity Work Demands (UEWD-R) Scale
    Cavalini, Miriam A.
    Berduszek, Redmar J.
    van der Sluis, Corry K.
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 74 (10) : 763 - 768
  • [50] Internal consistency and construct validity of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire adapted for work disability following a musculoskeletal disorder
    Albert, Valerie
    Coutu, Marie-France
    Durand, Marie-Jose
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (07) : 557 - 565