A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency

被引:53
|
作者
Sheahan, Peter J. [1 ]
Nelson-Wong, Erika J. [2 ]
Fischer, Steven L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, 28 Div St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Regis Univ, Rueckert Hartman Coll Hlth Profess, Sch Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
关键词
Construct validity; cross-cultural adaptation; internal consistency; oswestry disability index; test-retest reliability; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CHINESE VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-report-based outcome measure used to quantify the extent of disability related to low back pain (LBP), a substantial contributor to workplace absenteeism. The ODI tool has been adapted for use by patients in several non-English speaking nations. It is unclear, however, if these adapted versions of the ODI are as credible as the original ODI developed for English-speaking nations. The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to identify culturally adapted versions of the ODI and to report on the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of these ODIs. Following a pragmatic review process, data were extracted from each study with regard to these four outcomes. While most studies applied adaptation processes in accordance with best-practice guidelines, there were some deviations. However, all studies reported high-quality psychometric properties: group mean construct validity was 0.7340.094 (indicated via a correlation coefficient), test-retest reliability was 0.9370.032 (indicated via an intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency was 0.8760.047 (indicated via Cronbach's alpha). Researchers can be confident when using any of these culturally adapted ODIs, or when comparing and contrasting results between cultures where these versions were employed.Implications for RehabilitationLow back pain is the second leading cause of disability in the world, behind only cancer.The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has been developed as a self-report outcome measure of low back pain for administration to patients.An understanding of the various cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI is important for more concerted multi-national research efforts.This review examines 16 cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI and should inform the work of health care and rehabilitation professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:2367 / 2374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Dutch Injustice Experience Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Pain
    Bults, R. M.
    Reneman, M. F.
    van Wilgen, C. P.
    Preuper, H. R. Schiphorst
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW, 2020, 13 (03) : 316 - 325
  • [32] Construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Thai version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-TH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
    Buntragulpoontawee M.
    Phutrit S.
    Tongprasert S.
    Wongpakaran T.
    Khunachiva J.
    BMC Research Notes, 11 (1)
  • [33] Face Memory and Face Matching Internal Consistency and Test-Retest Reliability for the CFMT plus and the GFMT-S
    Petersen, Lara Aylin
    Leue, Anja
    JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 43 (03) : 152 - 159
  • [34] Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the oswestry disability index - Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity
    Vigatto, Ricardo
    Costa Alexandre, Neusa Maria
    Correa Filho, Heleno Rodrigues
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (04) : 481 - 486
  • [35] A reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the pre-sleep arousal scale (PSAS)
    Correia, Ines Luana
    Husain, Waqar
    Gonsalves, Maria Teresa
    Pires, Luis
    Trabelsi, Khaled
    Achraf, Ammar
    Pandi-Perumal, Seithikurippu R.
    Nicassio, Perry M.
    Jansson-Frojmark, Markus
    Vitiello, Michael V.
    Marques, Daniel Ruivo
    Jahrami, Haitham
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2025, 126 : 290 - 299
  • [36] The eye-complaint questionnaire in a visual display unit work environment: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability
    Steenstra, Ivan A.
    Sluiter, Judith K.
    Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
    ERGONOMICS, 2009, 52 (03) : 334 - 344
  • [37] Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in wrist osteoarthritis: test-retest reliability and construct validity
    Larsson, Sara L.
    Brogren, Elisabeth
    Dahlin, Lars B.
    Bjorkman, Anders
    Ekstrand, Elisabeth
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [38] Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity
    A. F. Mannion
    A. Junge
    J. C. T. Fairbank
    J. Dvorak
    D. Grob
    European Spine Journal, 2006, 15 : 55 - 65
  • [39] Adapted Manual Wheelchair Circuit: Test-Retest Reliability and Discriminative Validity in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
    Cowan, Rachel E.
    Nash, Mark S.
    de Groot, Sonja
    van der Woude, Lucas H.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (08): : 1270 - 1280
  • [40] Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity
    Mannion, AF
    Junge, A
    Fairbank, JCT
    Dvorak, J
    Grob, D
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (01) : 55 - 65