A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency

被引:53
|
作者
Sheahan, Peter J. [1 ]
Nelson-Wong, Erika J. [2 ]
Fischer, Steven L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, 28 Div St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Regis Univ, Rueckert Hartman Coll Hlth Profess, Sch Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
关键词
Construct validity; cross-cultural adaptation; internal consistency; oswestry disability index; test-retest reliability; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CHINESE VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-report-based outcome measure used to quantify the extent of disability related to low back pain (LBP), a substantial contributor to workplace absenteeism. The ODI tool has been adapted for use by patients in several non-English speaking nations. It is unclear, however, if these adapted versions of the ODI are as credible as the original ODI developed for English-speaking nations. The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to identify culturally adapted versions of the ODI and to report on the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of these ODIs. Following a pragmatic review process, data were extracted from each study with regard to these four outcomes. While most studies applied adaptation processes in accordance with best-practice guidelines, there were some deviations. However, all studies reported high-quality psychometric properties: group mean construct validity was 0.7340.094 (indicated via a correlation coefficient), test-retest reliability was 0.9370.032 (indicated via an intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency was 0.8760.047 (indicated via Cronbach's alpha). Researchers can be confident when using any of these culturally adapted ODIs, or when comparing and contrasting results between cultures where these versions were employed.Implications for RehabilitationLow back pain is the second leading cause of disability in the world, behind only cancer.The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has been developed as a self-report outcome measure of low back pain for administration to patients.An understanding of the various cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI is important for more concerted multi-national research efforts.This review examines 16 cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI and should inform the work of health care and rehabilitation professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:2367 / 2374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score in patients with shoulder disorders
    Alsanawi, Hisham Abdulaziz
    Alghadir, Ahmad H.
    Anwer, Shahnawaz
    Alenazi, Hind Abdulsalam
    Li, Heng
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (19) : 2790 - 2796
  • [2] Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
    Valasek, Tamas
    Varga, Peter Paul
    Szoeverfi, Zsolt
    Kuemin, Michelle
    Fairbank, Jeremy
    Lazary, Aron
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (05) : 1010 - 1018
  • [3] Long term test-retest reliability of Oswestry Disability Index in male office workers
    Irmak, Rafet
    Baltaci, Gul
    Ergun, Nevin
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2016, 53 (03): : 639 - 642
  • [4] Adaptation of the Oswestry Disability Index to Kannada Language and Evaluation of Its Validity and Reliability
    Mohan, Venkatdeep
    Prashanth, G. S.
    Meravanigi, Gururaja
    Rajagopalan, N.
    Yerramshetty, Janardhan
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (11) : E674 - E680
  • [5] Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI): Structural Validity, Construct Validity, Internal Consistency, and Test-retest Reliability
    Modarresi, Shirin
    Farzad, Maryam
    Shafiee, Erfan
    Modarresi, Golale
    Maleki, Mahshad
    Bakhshi, Enayatollah
    Hosseini, Seyed Ali
    Walton, David Mark
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2023, 11 (01): : 53 - 63
  • [6] Assessing the Psychometric Validity of the Epistaxis Severity Score: Internal Consistency and Test-Retest Reliability
    Gong, Anna J.
    Bolsegui, Marisabel Linares
    Lee, Emerson E.
    Mathai, Stephen C.
    Weiss, Clifford R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2024, 38 (01) : 38 - 46
  • [7] Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale
    Tamás Valasek
    Peter Paul Varga
    Zsolt Szövérfi
    Michelle Kümin
    Jeremy Fairbank
    Aron Lazary
    European Spine Journal, 2013, 22 : 1010 - 1018
  • [8] Validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the Montenegrin 10-item Voice Handicap Index
    Zvrko, Elvir
    Kadic, Muhedin
    ARHIV ZA HIGIJENU RADA I TOKSIKOLOGIJU-ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 73 (02): : 143 - 147
  • [9] Brazilian version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-BR): Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity
    da Silva Rodrigues, Eula Katucha
    Registro Fonseca, Marisa de Cassia
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2015, 28 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [10] Reliability Analyses for the ADSI: Test-Retest and Internal Consistency
    Corrigan, M. J.
    Gurdineer, E. E.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD & ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2012, 21 (03) : 247 - 253