Prediction of Slope Stability Using Four Supervised Learning Methods

被引:94
作者
Lin, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Keping [1 ]
Li, Jielin [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Civil Environm & Min Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2018年 / 6卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Slope stability; supervised learning methods; gravitational search algorithm; 10-fold cross validation; ROC curves; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION; MODEL; AREA; SIMULATION; STRENGTH; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2843787
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The analysis and prediction of slope stability are very important, because slope failure can lead to large disasters. This paper focused on a performance comparison of four supervised learning methods for slope stability prediction. Based on characteristics of slope instability and analysis of data availability, six typical slope parameters-the unit weight, cohesion, internal friction angle, slope inclination, slope height, and pore water ratio-were chosen to establish the evaluation index system. The gravitational search algorithm (GSA), random forest (RF), support vector machine, and naive Bayesian (Bayes) were proposed to establish classifiers. A data set from more than 10 domestic and abroad slope projects was established to train and test the four classifiers, and then, key parameters of the four models were optimized by using the method of 10-fold cross validation. The prediction performances of the four supervised learning methods were compared and analyzed. The results of accuracy, Kappa, and receiver operating characteristic curves reveal that both GSA and RF models can achieve satisfactory results, and the GSA model can obtain the best results when compared with the other three learning methods. Finally, seven models with varying indicators are investigated to obtain the parameter sensitivity based on RF and GSA models.
引用
收藏
页码:31169 / 31179
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [51] 3 FUNDAMENTAL-CONCEPTS OF THE CAPACITY OF LEARNING MACHINES[J]. VAPNIK, V. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 1993(1-4)
  • [52] Wen Tingxin, 2014, Science & Technology Review, V32, P105, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2014.h1.018
  • [53] A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples[J]. Wongpakaran, Nahathai;Wongpakaran, Tinakon;Wedding, Danny;Gwet, Kilem L. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013
  • [54] Application of a support vector machine for prediction of slope stability[J]. Xue XinHua;Yang XingGuo;Chen Xin. SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014(12)
  • [55] Predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of cemented paste backfill from ultrasonic pulse velocity test[J]. Yilmaz, Tekin;Ercikdi, Bayram. NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2016(03)
  • [56] Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia[J]. Youssef, Ahmed Mohamed;Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza;Pourtaghi, Zohre Sadat;Al-Katheeri, Mohamed M. LANDSLIDES, 2016(05)
  • [57] Development of an adaptive relevance vector machine approach for slope stability inference[J]. Zhang, Zongfeng;Liu, Zaobao;Zheng, Lifeng;Zhang, Yu. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2014(7-8)
  • [58] Classification of Rockburst in Underground Projects: Comparison of Ten Supervised Learning Methods[J]. Zhou, Jian;Li, Xibing;Mitri, Hani S. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016(05)
  • [59] Comparative performance of six supervised learning methods for the development of models of hard rock pillar stability prediction[J]. Zhou, Jian;Li, Xibing;Mitri, Hani S. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015(01)
  • [60] Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines[J]. Zhou Jian;Li Xibing;Shi Xiuzhi. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012(04)