Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur

被引:95
作者
Rudman, K. E. [1 ]
Aspden, R. M. [1 ]
Meakin, J. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1475-925X-5-12
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Questions regarding the distribution of stress in the proximal human femur have never been adequately resolved. Traditionally, by considering the femur in isolation, it has been believed that the effect of body weight on the projecting neck and head places the superior aspect of the neck in tension. A minority view has proposed that this region is in compression because of muscular forces pulling the femur into the pelvis. Little has been done to study stress distributions in the proximal femur. We hypothesise that under physiological loading the majority of the proximal femur is in compression and that the internal trabecular structure functions as an arch, transferring compressive stresses to the femoral shaft. Methods: To demonstrate the principle, we have developed a 2D finite element model of the femur in which body weight, a representation of the pelvis, and ligamentous forces were included. The regions of higher trabecular bone density in the proximal femur ( the principal trabecular systems) were assigned a higher modulus than the surrounding trabecular bone. Two-legged and one-legged stances, the latter including an abductor force, were investigated. Results: The inclusion of ligamentous forces in two-legged stance generated compressive stresses in the proximal femur. The increased modulus in areas of greater structural density focuses the stresses through the arch-like internal structure. Including an abductor muscle force in simulated one-legged stance also produced compression, but with a different distribution. Conclusion: This 2D model shows, in principle, that including ligamentous and muscular forces has the effect of generating compressive stresses across most of the proximal femur. The arch-like trabecular structure transmits the compressive loads to the shaft. The greater strength of bone in compression than in tension is then used to advantage. These results support the hypothesis presented. If correct, a better understanding of the stress distribution in the proximal femur may lead to improvements in prosthetic devices and an appreciation of the effects of various surgical procedures affecting load transmission across the hip.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
HEYMAN J, 1995, STONE SKELETON STRUC, P108
[12]   COMPOSITION AND PROPERTIES OF CONNECTIVE TISSUES [J].
HUKINS, DWL ;
ASPDEN, RM .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1985, 10 (07) :260-264
[13]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TENSILE AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS OF BOVINE TIBIAL TRABECULAR BONE DEPEND ON MODULUS [J].
KEAVENY, TM ;
WACHTEL, EF ;
FORD, CM ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1994, 27 (09) :1137-1146
[14]  
KEAVENY TM, 2001, BONE MECH HDB, V16
[15]   Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis [J].
Li, BH ;
Aspden, RM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (04) :641-651
[16]   THE ROLE OF CAPSULAR CHANGES IN OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP JOINT [J].
LLOYDROBERTS, GC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1953, 35 (04) :627-642
[17]   FRACTURE PREDICTION FOR THE PROXIMAL FEMUR USING FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS .2. NONLINEAR-ANALYSIS [J].
LOTZ, JC ;
CHEAL, EJ ;
HAYES, WC .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (04) :361-365
[18]   STRESS DISTRIBUTIONS WITHIN THE PROXIMAL FEMUR DURING GAIT AND FALLS - IMPLICATIONS FOR OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURE [J].
LOTZ, JC ;
CHEAL, EJ ;
HAYES, WC .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :252-261
[19]  
LOTZ JC, 1991, J BIOMECH ENG-T ASME, V113, P353, DOI 10.1115/1.2895412
[20]  
MEYER H, 1867, ARCH ANAT PHYSL, V34, P615