Using Pattern Recognition with HOG to Automatically Detect Reflection Hyperbolas in Ground penetrating Radar Data

被引:0
|
作者
Noreen, T. [1 ]
Khan, Umar S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mechatron Engn, Islamabad, Pakistan
来源
2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS (ICECTA) | 2017年
关键词
Automatic detection; GPR radargram; SVM; histogram of oriented gradient features; haar-like features; hyperbolic signatures; pipe detection; LANDMINE DETECTION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is used for nondestructive examination of utility present underground such as cables, pipes, and landmines. Cables and pipes make hyperbolic shape signatures in GPR radargrams. Automatic detection of hyperbolic signature narrow down the region of interest and therefore results in reduced data set for localization of the buried pipe. In this paper, a machine learning approach is used to detect hyperbolic signatures using a support vector machine (SVM) with the histogram of oriented gradient features (HOG). For this purpose, Voila Jones algorithm is used in Matlab to train a classifier with HOG features instead of haar features. The HOG features have not been used with SVM in the literature for hyperbolic signature detection in the ground penetrating radar (GPR) radargrams. In this paper, it is shown that HOG feature based classifier achieve a high detection rate of 0.758 with a low false positive rate of 0.394. The detection algorithm is tested on both real GPR data and synthetic GPR data. Synthetic GPR data is created on an open source software gprMax.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 470
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Landmine Detection using Ground Penetrating Radar
    Temlioglu, Eyyup
    Dag, Mahmut
    Gurcan, Ridvan
    2016 24TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATION APPLICATION CONFERENCE (SIU), 2016, : 665 - 668
  • [42] Improvement of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Data Interpretability by an Enhanced Inverse Scattering Strategy
    Persico, Raffaele
    Ludeno, Giovanni
    Soldovieri, Francesco
    De Coster, Alberic
    Lambot, Sebastien
    SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 39 (06) : 1069 - 1079
  • [43] Observations on Syntactic Landmine Detection using Impulse Ground-Penetrating Radar
    Nasif, Ahmed O.
    Hintz, Kenneth J.
    DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XVI, 2011, 8017
  • [44] Crevasse Detection in Ice Sheets Using Ground Penetrating Radar and Machine Learning
    Williams, Rebecca M.
    Ray, Laura E.
    Lever, James H.
    Burzynski, Amy M.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 7 (12) : 4836 - 4848
  • [45] MAP image reconstruction for landmine and IED detection using ground penetrating radar
    Anderson, John M. M.
    Ode, Oludotun
    Ndoye, Mandoye
    Mair, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 40 (22) : 8298 - 8321
  • [46] A MULTIPLE INSTANCE LEARNING APPROACH FOR LANDMINE DETECTION USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR
    Karem, Andrew
    Frigui, Hichem
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2011, : 878 - 881
  • [47] Landmine detection using fuzzy clustering in DARPA backgrounds data collected with the geo-centers ground penetrating radar
    Gader, PD
    Keller, JM
    Liu, HW
    DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS III, PTS 1 AND 2, 1998, 3392 : 1139 - 1149
  • [48] Transfer and Multitask Learning using Convolutional Neural Networks for Buried Wire Detection from Ground Penetrating Radar Data
    Aydin, Enver
    Yuksel Erdem, Seniha Esen
    DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XXIV, 2019, 11012
  • [49] How transferable are downward-looking and handheld ground penetrating radar data? Experiments in the context of buried threat detection
    Stump, Evan
    Reichman, Daniel
    Collins, Leslie M.
    Malof, Jordan M.
    DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XXIV, 2019, 11012
  • [50] On Choosing Training and Testing Data for Supervised Algorithms in Ground-Penetrating Radar Data for Buried Threat Detection
    Reichman, Daniel
    Collins, Leslie M.
    Malof, Jordan M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 56 (01): : 497 - 507