Which common indices of sclerophylly best reflect differences in leaf structure?

被引:46
作者
Groom, PK
Lamont, BB
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nat Sci, Ctr Ecosyst Management, Joondalup 6027, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ Technol, Sch Environm Biol, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
来源
ECOSCIENCE | 1999年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
sclerophylly; leaf mass per area; fibre : protein ratio; leaf structure;
D O I
10.1080/11956860.1999.11682537
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
When describing the sclerophyllous nature of leaves, two indices are most commonly cited: fibre:protein ratio (FPR), better known as the Loveless sclerophylly index; and leaf mass per unit area (LMA), or its inverse, specific leaf area (SLA). Here, we assess the relative importance of these two indices in accounting for changes in leaf structure, the primary basis for variations in sclerophylly. FPR compares structural (i.e., lignin and cellulose [crude fibre]) to non-structural (i.e., protein approximate to protoplasm) leaf material, on the basis that increasing sclerophylly is associated with a greater contribution of crude fibre and smaller contribution of protein to total dry weight. However, raising the crude fibre content is just one way of increasing sclerophylly, and a decrease in the nitrogen content (i.e., protein) does not contribute directly to the impression of leaf hardness. While FPR lacks a clear anatomical basis, it may provide a biochemical interpretation of sclerophylly. In contrast, LMA is the cross product of leaf thickness and leaf density, two (often independent) attributes that are linked to different components of a leafs anatomical/structural attributes. We show that FPR and LMA are often poorly correlated and conclude that LMA is a more useful measure of sclerophylly, especially when thickness and density are known.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 474
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   GENOTYPIC AND PHENOTYPIC VARIATION AS STRESS ADAPTATIONS IN TEMPERATE TREE SPECIES - A REVIEW OF SEVERAL CASE-STUDIES [J].
ABRAMS, MD .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 14 (7-9) :833-842
[2]   SOIL PHOSPHATE AND ITS ROLE IN MOLDING SEGMENTS OF AUSTRALIAN FLORA AND VEGETATION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO XEROMORPHY AND SCLEROPHYLLY [J].
BEADLE, NCW .
ECOLOGY, 1966, 47 (06) :992-&
[3]  
Charles-Edwards D.A., 1986, MODELLING PLANT GROW
[4]   LEAF FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS AND SCLEROPHYLLY - THEIR CORRELATIONS AND ECOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
CHOONG, MF ;
LUCAS, PW ;
ONG, JSY ;
PEREIRA, B ;
TAN, HTW ;
TURNER, IM .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1992, 121 (04) :597-610
[5]   LEAF ANATOMY, SPECIFIC MASS AND WATER-CONTENT IN CONGENERIC ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL GRASS SPECIES [J].
GARNIER, E ;
LAURENT, G .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1994, 128 (04) :725-736
[6]   Xerophytic implications of increased sclerophylly: Interactions with water and light in Hakea psilorrhyncha seedlings [J].
Groom, PK ;
Lamont, BB .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1997, 136 (02) :231-237
[7]  
GROOM PK, 1994, AUST J BOT, V42, P307
[8]   Influence of leaf type and plant age on leaf structure and sclerophylly in Hakea (Proteaceae) [J].
Groom, PK ;
Lamont, BB ;
Markey, AS .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1997, 45 (05) :827-838
[9]  
Grubb P.J., 1986, P137
[10]   LEAF WATER POTENTIAL LEAF WATER-DEFICIT RELATIONSHIP FOR 10 SPECIES OF A SEMIARID GRASSLAND COMMUNITY [J].
KALAPOS, T .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1994, 160 (01) :105-112